Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule vs Brady Christiansen


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Not just guard - right guard.  Opposite side that he has played his entire career.

The longer he is here, the more Rhule looks like Rivera.

Yeah right. There’s no way rhule could ever go 12-4 or 15-1 or make the playoffs, much less a super bowl. People hate on Ron but at least he had some good years.

Rhule is one of the worst coaches in the league, if not the worst. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

Yeah right. There’s no way rhule could ever go 12-4 or 15-1 or make the playoffs, much less a super bowl. People hate on Ron but at least he had some good years.

Rhule is one of the worst coaches in the league, if not the worst. 

Would like to see a Urban/Rhule matchup.  It’s like the inverse of the Super Bowl.  But there would be some entertainment value in the slop 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule is done and if not, I will be questioning if I want to stay a fan for the first time ever.  

I'm ready for this organization to get a full revamp with really just like DJ Moore, Chinn, Horn, Burns & Tremble safe. We had a lot of turnover but held certain dudes from Hurney/DG/Rivera era in place.

PURGE this mother f*cking franchise top down.  Get Cam away from this mess, fire the staff, get Samir+Fit to figure out an out with CMC and Sam's contracts.

Being ~9 around inception, I was just old enough to remember how god awful 1-15 was.  This really seems worse.  Worse than Claussen's 2-14 year because we were b-lining to the #1 pick.  And it's truly because of the culture and coaching.  They have NO IDEA what they're doing.  We've got guys out of their league by a country mile.  

I've never seen the board this "f*ck off"-ish about the team but it truly appears that unlikeable at the moment and Tepper needs to correct it, not try to use his social team's to navigate through some bullsh*t narratives.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...