Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule: Cam holding ball too long


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jopie87 said:

You know what, coaching ability aside (he has none), I just don't Ike Matt Rhule as a person. He's a poor leader, two-faced, and an awful representative of the franchise. Other coaches have frustrated all of us with their on field results, but Rhule is legitimately the first one I look at and dislike as a man. I don't see how anyone can support this dude inside and outside of the building.

 hes what you call a weasel .... i'll never respect him...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I’ve struggled listening to Rhule talk since this past offseason.  It was clear then he was a joke, in over his head and has no clue about the NFL. 
 

Hell, I remember his first days BLATANTLY lying about “how excited” he was to coach Cam Newton and 99% of this forum giving him a pass, calling it “coach speak”.

No, Rhule was and is an arrogant and utterly dishonest cockroach and its nice to see eyes finally opening around Panther Nation about that.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
16 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You are a stone-cold liar who has voices in his head...

...either prove it or STFU.

See now you're just incriminating yourself, because this is how you acted before when people figured you out.

Complete horse-hockey...

...prove it🤣

It's hard to keep track of all the different names you have made accusations on:

Sanjay, now "coach" something or other, what else? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete horse-hockey...

...prove it🤣

It's hard to keep track of all the different names you have made accusations on:

Sanjay, now "coach" something or other, what else? 

I've said Sanjay. UNCfan says Retired College Coach.

They're somewhat different profiles. Sanjay was a guy with...issues. Retired College Coach was just an a--hole.

Both wanted people to think they were football experts when pretty much everybody could tell they weren't.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've said Sanjay. UNCfan says Retired College Coach.

They're somewhat different profiles. Sanjay was a guy with...issues. Retired College Coach was just an a--hole.

Both wanted people to think they were football experts when pretty much everybody could tell they weren't.

SBIII, George Hanson..  Got booted multiple times for racist poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...