Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It’s this week or next


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

If Tepper is smart...

This is the part of the equation that concerns me.

  

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We had our pick of the litter last time and we picked a sickly runt.

This is why it concerns me.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

So here we are the final 3 games. The way I see it is if Rhule isn’t terminated this week or next, he will be with us next season. Just doesn’t seem like we wait until the 10th and allow other teams to have their “pick of the litter”.

19-Dec @ Buffalo (loss)

26-Dec VS Tampa (TBD)

2-Jan @ NO (TBD)

9-Jan @ Tampa (TBD)

December 28th is the day that teams can start requesting interviews IF their HC is not employed or informed he will not be here next season.

There are already 2 (JAX, LV) that need HCs and likely a few more seeing their end Monday. (CHI, HOU, Possibly MIN, CLE, NYG)

 

580380B3-03E9-4F0A-AB0E-C93B5BCF546D.jpeg

Now didn’t you say from some sources that Rhule would be gone either this coming Monday or the Monday after the Saints game and that the delay was naming an interim ?

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Now didn’t you say from some sources that Rhule would be gone either this coming Monday or the Monday after the Saints game and that the delay was naming an interim ?

Yes that is what I heard. My sources aren’t what they used to be. I would put my eggs into the basket that Rhule is gone. If not in the next two weeks, end of the season. Don’t think he’s going to be around next year but what I have isn’t 100%.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cdparr7 said:

Yes that is what I heard. My sources aren’t what they used to be. I would put my eggs into the basket that Rhule is gone. If not in the next two weeks, end of the season. Don’t think he’s going to be around next year but what I have isn’t 100%.

Ok. Thanks for clarifying 

I hope your sources are right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...