Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After 3 games (all wins) what was your opinion on...


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Offense looked like one with potential to be tops in the league. We would just have one inconsistent quarter.

Sam was making reads quick and standing in there taking hits and still delivering strikes. 

DJ was looking like a problem. 

Even after our 4th game against Dallas with the back to back picks I thought we still had something. Refs clearly had it out for us and they still battled back and made it a one score game with a chance for the D to get a stop and get the ball back. 

Then it all unraveled so fast. CMC got hurt, the offense went vanilla, opposing defenses learned we run 3 routes a a game and they could squat on them, WRs forgot how to catch and the Oline turned into what we all knew it would. Sam quickly turned back into Sam sometime during that stretch of games against garbage teams with losing records and then it all comes clear... we are one of those garbage teams too. 

 

This is a good synopsis! I point back to the end of the half against philly when we punted on a fourth and 2 as the turning point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first 3 games, the D looked great more than Sam looked good. Sam looked like he was playing at his ceiling witch is functional backup but it also looked like the other teams were not very good. It was early in the year, the football is always sloppy and that's what it looked like. Well that and 2 really bad teams and a crippled Saints team.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Waldo said:

The first 3 games, the D looked great more than Sam looked good. Sam looked like he was playing at his ceiling witch is functional backup but it also looked like the other teams were not very good. It was early in the year, the football is always sloppy and that's what it looked like. Well that and 2 really bad teams and a crippled Saints team.

 

Yup, no one knew exactly how bad Zach Wilson is as well. I was already feeling suspicious after coming out flat in the 2nd half of that game

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup, no one knew exactly how bad Zach Wilson is as well. I was already feeling suspicious after coming out flat in the 2nd half of that game

LOL…so hilarious.  He had no chance at being good with the Jets.  I would have picked him there without hesitation.  Even Lawrence struggled.  Its all about the team around them.  Darnold with a stout OL?

Oh My God Wow GIF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised.  I have said on here several times I think it would take 3 years for this team to be decent because we were in such bad shape when Rhule came in.  I thought we'd do better against some of the teams and worse against others.  But I was not expecting us to be better than .500.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's just a talking head.  Talking about gambling. If anybody takes the under on 4.5 wins, they're most likely losing their money.   So he's only saying if you want to bet on a possible sleeper, take the over.  It's not rocket science.  Pathetic that so many on the huddle have reduced themselves to posting purely trash every time they hit the submit button.
    • I mean I think the best case scenario has to hit for the Panthers and everyone else in the NFCS has to hit their worst case scenario.  Personally, I think this is the year that NO finally collapses and I think they finish 4th in the division regardless.  ATL is overrated but still likely a 6-9 win team. TB plays tough football, their defense will be there but their success depends on the offense, they too are a 6-9 win team.  The Panthers are probably 4-6 wins at best. If they find some sort of momentum during the season and get 7-8 wins, and TB and ATL struggle then maybe but I find it very unlikely. 
    • We screwed up a couple years ago taking Bryce in the first place.  Nobody held a gun to our head to jump from #9 to #1.  Most people who keep up with draft news knew this 2024 QB class was loaded and we should have waited, which I advocated. It was a dumb move and I knew it.  Now we have to roll with Bryce another year.  That's fine, because this 2025 class isn't that great.  I like Ewers, but not super high on him.  If Bryce shows improvement, which I think he will, that should get him at least one more season before we have to decide on if he's the permanent answer or not.  I've said before, the 2026 draft is the next window for a franchise QB if Bryce isn't the answer. Bryce gets this year and next at a minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...