Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could this team beat the 2001 or 2010 teams?


KillerKat
 Share

Which is worse?  

62 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is worse?

    • 2001 Panthers
      7
    • 2010 Panthers
      22
    • 2021 Panthers
      33


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Rhule and Fitterer can’t draft. They had all those picks and not one single impact player came out of the whole thing. Got a decent RB2 and a CB2 who couldn’t stay on the field, plus a slew of XFL-caliber players. 

The 2021 draft will go down as one of the two or three worst in franchise history — basically 2011, if there was no Cam

Can't draft or can't develop? It's hard to definitively know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Depends if Matt Moore or Jimmy Clausen is starting for the 2010 team. Matt Moore would blow this team out, Jimmy would be closer but J-Stew and D-Will would run all over this team.

Before Matt got hurt that year, he was promising. Fox also started him before he was 100% which further hurt his progress. Healthy Matt Moore would kill us. He had 8 Tds and 1 int in his last 5 games in 2009. A couple of those games with 3 Tds and 0 ints against the Brett Favre lead Vikings and the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Before Matt got hurt that year, he was promising. Fox also started him before he was 100% which further hurt his progress. Healthy Matt Moore would kill us. He had 8 Tds and 1 int in his last 5 games in 2009. A couple of those games with 3 Tds and 0 ints against the Brett Favre lead Vikings and the Giants.

Yeah if Matt hadn’t gotten hurt we were probably a 5-7 win team. He played great against SF and then went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of revisionist history with just how bad Jimmy Clausen was.. 3 TDs in 13 games. And our defense? 28th in points allowed. 

That defense couldn't stop this years team. Nick Hayden, Tyler Brayton, Dan Connor, Richard Marshall, Charles Godfrey and Sherrod Martin are far and away inferior to our team now.

Matt Moore, Stewart and Smitty may cook our present defense tho.

And Fox>>>>Rhule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Lot of revisionist history with just how bad Jimmy Clausen was.. 3 TDs in 13 games. And our defense? 28th in points allowed. 

That defense couldn't stop this years team. Nick Hayden, Tyler Brayton, Dan Connor, Richard Marshall, Charles Godfrey and Sherrod Martin are far and away inferior to our team now.

Matt Moore, Stewart and Smitty may cook our present defense tho.

And Fox>>>>Rhule

You did selectively take away the defenders that were far, far better than our current ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...