Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let us not forget this product is AFTER an offseason of focus on the offense rebuild


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

While this staff is making excuses for it taking time and the offense not being there, we just had an offseason where we traded for a QB, drafted 2 WRs, RB, TE, 2 OLs, signed 4 OLs, signed a TE.  This is the product. 

What if I told you that week Rhule was signed, before Luke retired, while we still had Cam, we would be looking at Sam Darnold, Ian Thomas, & Ameer Abdullah leading the way come the end of our second season? Our TE1 isn't even the guy he signed OR drafted, our main pass catching RB is a Detroit castoff, and our QB a NYJ castoff.  Just putrid.    

Just another negative thread but we shouldn't lose that this is all after an entire offseason with really an offensive focus.  They were able to handpick like every player minus CMC & Moore.  This is just stupid roster building. 

 

Edited by davos
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure I guess but it's not like we went out and made a bunch of splash signings or high picks on offense. This wasn't the New England offseason where like $100 million were spent on new receivers/tight ends or Kansas City trading a first for an OT and paying a premium for Thuney. Our flashiest moves beyond Darnold involved dumpster diving for our O line, and spending one of the last picks of the 2nd round for a 3rd WR. 

Either way, when you don't have coaches capable of designing a NFL caliber offensive gameplan, it doesn't matter who you have.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you know. Apparently winning is secondary to Bryce’s development. Same as it has been.     In a way it may be good because we didn’t need to make the playoffs and extend this fuging charade about Bryce being the guy. Better in the long run if he gets enough rope to hang himself with. 
    • Dave Canales is not the problem. He just isn't 
    • I know DC is overthinking this and he really needs to be OC or HC, but how do you call plays with a QB that in all reality, shouldn't be starting. Bryce is wildly inconsistent. He should lean on Rico and the run game, but if he does and wins, it presents a false narrative that Bryce is better than he is and he's potentially stuck with him for another season. If he doesn't, he looks incompetent as a play caller, but it exposes the ugly side of his QB situation that he really does need a QB that can execute at minimum a basic NFL offense with some decent consistency.  I feel a little sorry for the guy because he was anchored with Young this season and even more weight with Dalton getting a 2 year deal. He has very little to work with at the most important position on his team and it's not his doing. The trade deadline was approaching and it was plainly obvious we needed to do something but we didn't for whatever reason.  I don't think he's a complete bonehead and don't know what he's supposed to do. Win games and potentially keep Bryce or lose them by putting the weight on Bryce's shoulders. Either he succeeds or fails.  As a coach I know you're supposed to play to win the game, but do you win now at the ultimate long term detriment to your team and locker room? 
×
×
  • Create New...