Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule is a liar and full of poo


slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

College players are young and naive and have to listen to their coaches….so Rhule’s bullshitting ways was tolerated.  It doesn’t work with grown men they probably saw right through him half way through last year.   
 

Even when he’s back in college in a couple of years his lies may not work anymore with NIL and the high profile kids making money.   I seriously haven’t hated a coach more not bc the mediocre coaching but the crap that comes out of his mouth.  It’s like he has a bad excuse for everything and his poo don’t stink….it’s everyone else’s fault.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he got a lot of credit for what he did with Baylor but Baylor has been a pretty good school before they got into trouble. Baylor is just as good right now without Rhule as they were with him. So I wonder how much Rhule really had to do with turning around Baylor. I have a feeling Baylor was a big enough school that they would have turned it around no matter who the coach was.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, rmoneyg35 said:

I know he got a lot of credit for what he did with Baylor but Baylor has been a pretty good school before they got into trouble. Baylor is just as good right now without Rhule as they were with him. So I wonder how much Rhule really had to do with turning around Baylor. I have a feeling Baylor was a big enough school that they would have turned it around no matter who the coach was.

I can’t remember, but didn’t he lose every game against ranked opponents? He got smacked around in the bowl game though. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

The Panthers problem is the offensive line, period.

Matt Rhule made Sam Darnold the man.  He assembled that OL.  He spent his top 10 pick on a DB.  He is the dude that punted from the opponents 30, calls timeouts and lets the boos make the playcall….

fix the OL and we still have Matt Rhule.  If your architect is unqualified….getting quality materials still won’t matter in the long run. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

The Panthers problem is the offensive line, period.

That’s a HUGE part of it, but not of all it. We do have a big coaching problem. Game clock mismanagement, wasting timeouts constantly, when to go for it, when not to go for it, leading the league in penalties, DL not setting the edge, not putting the greatest rushing qb of all time in for a sneak with only inches to go, roster moves, lineup issues (who to start where) etc. Sure, we can fix the line, but until Rhule is gone, we will be average at best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, rmoneyg35 said:

I know he got a lot of credit for what he did with Baylor but Baylor has been a pretty good school before they got into trouble. Baylor is just as good right now without Rhule as they were with him. So I wonder how much Rhule really had to do with turning around Baylor. I have a feeling Baylor was a big enough school that they would have turned it around no matter who the coach was.

Ask the Ole Miss Rebels.  That was not a second rate Baylor team, that embarrassed them in the Sugar Bowl.  Baylor without Rhule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...