Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Special Teams Coach Interviews


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Blackburn was actually a pretty good coach. Yea special teams had some gaffes but they were probably the most consistent unit on the team until Gonzalez got hurt. He had to deal with an injury to Charlton too and went out they got a guy who was better. Could we have a flashier special teams unit in the return game? Oh absolutely. But I didn’t see many bogus fumbles on punt returns or kickoffs and the kicking game really game together.

I agree with some of the coaching changes but this one might not have been a good idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Is that the only measurable improvement on the entire roster?

 

No.

Zane also (prior to this year) was a career 78% FG kicker.  This season he hit them at a 90% rate.

The guy we picked up off the scrap heap after Charlton's head went was a career 45 per punt guy.  This season with us he averaged almost 48 per punt.

The main argument against Blackburn seemed to be the coverage unit.  Well, that was also largely false.  Check this out:

image.thumb.png.0ba31bb0b63971c4f0d47133f99458ea.png

We were 8th in the league in average punt return yardage against.

Our kickoff returns were not wonderful - but that was always going to be an issue with Gonzalez.  And it was something that Gonzalez improved on over the course of the year.

There is no statistic that supports the idea Blackburn should have been fired.  Our specialists - both acquired DURING the season - improved significantly upon their career performances.  Our coverage was good where we could expect it to be so, and an issue where we knew it was likely to be an issue.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BrianS said:

There is no statistic that supports the idea Blackburn should have been fired.  Our specialists - both acquired DURING the season - improved significantly upon their career performances.  Our coverage was good where we could expect it to be so, and an issue where we knew it was likely to be an issue.

That's right we actually fielded punts and fell forward this year so that's two areas on STs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SCPantherFan90 said:

From the article...

McMahon’s tenure in Denver featured multiple blocked punts and field goal attempts, and arguably the worst kick coverage in the league. Over the last four seasons, the Broncos allowed an NFL-high six returns for touchdowns (four on kickoffs and two on punts).

This season, most of Brandon McManus’ kickoffs were touchbacks (62), but on Denver’s 14 kickoffs that were returned, opposing teams averaged 39.4 yards per return. That represented the worst kickoff coverage in the NFL.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fox007 said:

That's right we actually fielded punts and fell forward this year so that's two areas on STs. 

image.thumb.png.cf0895562a5816ffbf1390588f810458.png

I get wanting to fire underperforming staff.  I really do.

I simply think that ANALYTICAL measurement of our special teams performance falls far short of a firing.  I have yet to see any analytical measurement that indicates otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From the article...

McMahon’s tenure in Denver featured multiple blocked punts and field goal attempts, and arguably the worst kick coverage in the league. Over the last four seasons, the Broncos allowed an NFL-high six returns for touchdowns (four on kickoffs and two on punts).

This season, most of Brandon McManus’ kickoffs were touchbacks (62), but on Denver’s 14 kickoffs that were returned, opposing teams averaged 39.4 yards per return. That represented the worst kickoff coverage in the NFL.

Hire this man right now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThPantherFan said:

A silent giant or a rip roaring blanket shaker?

a whimper tbh sad to admit

my good friend vibrated the house once and woke his parents up when we were in HS...he was sitting on the tub and that poo vibraniumed the foundation of the joint

moms come in there like "you ok"

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

image.thumb.png.cf0895562a5816ffbf1390588f810458.png

I get wanting to fire underperforming staff.  I really do.

I simply think that ANALYTICAL measurement of our special teams performance falls far short of a firing.  I have yet to see any analytical measurement that indicates otherwise.

I think that you think I'm being sarcastic when I'm not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So what about their sign is not compliant or causing the issue according to the rules? Them always having it, or the amount of time they have had it, or their loyalty to the team is not relevant to this situation. To be clear, I know next to nothing about this situation, just trying to clarify.  I have no dog in this fight and am emotionless on this topic. If you are breaking a rule, you do not get special treatment just because you have been here breaking it a long time.
    • The team fell for that late season averageness he displayed last year and got burned. You want to do that again? I don’t.  But I sort of do agree that we are stuck with him as the starter.  I can’t decide whether replacing him gets us into the playoffs so suffering through one last season is the price for freedom in 2026.  Three ways to be free in 2026: He actually plays like a real NFL QB,  The team sends him packing. Be completely out on tne Panthers until changes are made. 
    • Short version = these people have had those seats since the beginning and haven't missed a game. They have always had their sign. They had to change the sign - I think in 2015 when Cam ripped that Packers fan's banner down (love him for that, by the way) - to be compliant and haven't had any issues in the last 10 years. The Panthers even used a photo of them and their sign in their album from the Falcons game. In the 3rd quarter last weekend it was decided that the sign needed to come down. Seems weird and unnecessary, especially since it has been there for every game for a decade.   EDIT: they've had it since 2003. Still a long-ass time.... Also "cringe" is a funny word for someone over the age of 18 who lives and overshares on the Huddle. But, ok....
×
×
  • Create New...