Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I have more Faith in Scott Fitterer than Rhule.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

One thing that is often left out of the conversation with regard to Darnold is while we did trade 3 picks for him and Fitts did sign that 5th year extension, it was Rhule's job to develop him. Darnold looks worse, not better. You can blame Fitts, you can blame Sam. But if Matt isn't doing his job of developing his QB, it's all for naught anyway. Just like everything else wrong in Carolina, it all leads back to Matt Rhule (and ultimately Tepper for not firing him).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have more faith in my cat to run this team than I do Rhule after what I have seen the past two seasons. Not pretending I'm some prodigy football god of knowledge or anything close but Rhule's ass is paid millions to be a football god of knowledge and he has proven to be the exact opposite so I have a right to my opinion. I truly feel most any person on this message board could have at worst run this team slightly better than Rhule and I would be willing to bet money on it. It is truly a laugh how pathetic things have gotten with this grossly overpaid goof ball. Fit may very well be okay but he is overshadowed by the bumbling narcissistic idiot Rhule.

 

In Love Cat GIF

Edited by YourLastThought
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

One thing that is often left out of the conversation with regard to Darnold is while we did trade 3 picks for him and Fitts did sign that 5th year extension, it was Rhule's job to develop him. Darnold looks worse, not better. You can blame Fitts, you can blame Sam. But if Matt isn't doing his job of developing his QB, it's all for naught anyway. Just like everything else wrong in Carolina, it all leads back to Matt Rhule (and ultimately Tepper for not firing him).

Valid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm iffy on anyone currently making decisions or having input in this front office. Wheeling and dealing got us into this mess. We got trade happy and didn't even come away with a for sure starter at what was our biggest area of need at the time and still is. Idk why folks are still forming a line to give Scott Fitterer sloppy toppy but he has just as much to prove as Rhule.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

I'm iffy on anyone currently making decisions or having input in this front office. Wheeling and dealing got us into this mess. We got trade happy and didn't even come away with a for sure starter at what was our biggest area of need at the time and still is. Idk why folks are still forming a line to give Scott Fitterer sloppy toppy but he has just as much to prove as Rhule.

I'm not forming up to give Fitts a sloppy anything. I'm saying right now, it's unknown if Fitts is the problem because Rhule is so much of the problem. 

He does not put players in the best position to succeed. He neutralized the real DROY by playing him out of position. He kept trying to force Brady in at guard when it was obvious in preseason he was playing better at LT. He refused to play Brown at RG because of his "weight". Darnold regressed. TMJ barely saw the field. Neither did Shi. His FA versatile linemen sucked just like we knew they would.

Fitts made mistakes in his first offseason no doubt. The day 1 contract numbers to Elf and Erving. Taking a long snapper over Smith. The Darnold trade (price)and extension (though I understand the logic).

Fitts needs to be judged without Rhule to be judged fairly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'm not forming up to give Fitts a sloppy anything. I'm saying right now, it's unknown if Fitts is the problem because Rhule is so much of the problem. 

He does not put players in the best position to succeed. He neutralized the real DROY by playing him out of position. He kept trying to force Brady in at guard when it was obvious in preseason he was playing better at LT. He refused to play Brown at RG because of his "weight". Darnold regressed. TMJ barely saw the field. Neither did Shi. His FA versatile linemen sucked just like we knew they would.

Fitts made mistakes in his first offseason no doubt. The day 1 contract numbers to Elf and Erving. Taking a long snapper over Smith. The Darnold trade (price)and extension (though I understand the logic).

Fitts needs to be judged without Rhule to be judged fairly. 

Please explain this logic behind the Darnold extension? What was there to gain? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Please explain this logic behind the Darnold extension? What was there to gain? 

 

Fitts just spent a 2nd, 4th and 6th in 2023 to get the HC his guy at QB. Since it's Rhule and Fitts first season working together, they know each other only by conversation to this point and some in office stuff. There hasn't been any in season working together. Rhule's rookie season the team looked to overachieve, a DROY candidate, and 8 games lost by a single score, a good sign that Rhule is on the right track after his first season. There's a little credibility established.

Enter the offseason and the draft. We tried to trade down but couldn't get the right asking price. I assume this was for Slater. We didn't, and Horn was our pick. Not a bad pick, not an all pro LT (hs 20/20). No Fields, no Mac, no other QB. Sam is our guy. The 5th year pretty much becomes a requirement at this point. You can't spend picks in 2023 on a rebuilding team for a QB that won't be on the team in 2023. 

Now Fitts had to expect Rhule to develop Darnold. You make that trade and extension and that's a virtual requirement. For every overachievement in his rookie season, Rhule underachieved and tanked his sophomore year as we all witnessed. Other than a couple of players like Shaq and Luvu, this entire squad went backwards. 

Believing in Rhule, believing in the bullshit, believing the hype, the Darnold extension makes sense from a GM perspective. When you see how Rhule devolved during the season, especially after Dallas, it was the worst possible scenario come to fruition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

 

Fitts just spent a 2nd, 4th and 6th in 2023 to get the HC his guy at QB. Since it's Rhule and Fitts first season working together, they know each other only by conversation to this point and some in office stuff. There hasn't been any in season working together. Rhule's rookie season the team looked to overachieve, a DROY candidate, and 8 games lost by a single score, a good sign that Rhule is on the right track after his first season. There's a little credibility established.

Enter the offseason and the draft. We tried to trade down but couldn't get the right asking price. I assume this was for Slater. We didn't, and Horn was our pick. Not a bad pick, not an all pro LT (hs 20/20). No Fields, no Mac, no other QB. Sam is our guy. The 5th year pretty much becomes a requirement at this point. You can't spend picks in 2023 on a rebuilding team for a QB that won't be on the team in 2023. 

Now Fitts had to expect Rhule to develop Darnold. You make that trade and extension and that's a virtual requirement. For every overachievement in his rookie season, Rhule underachieved and tanked his sophomore year as we all witnessed. Other than a couple of players like Shaq and Luvu, this entire squad went backwards. 

Believing in Rhule, believing in the bullshit, believing the hype, the Darnold extension makes sense from a GM perspective. When you see how Rhule devolved during the season, especially after Dallas, it was the worst possible scenario come to fruition. 

Why was it a requirement? Just because the team traded picks for a project. Him only costing 4.7M for a year long tryout was the purpose. What rule says a team must double down on something with no upside. As I’ve explained many times, before this happened and even today, there was no upside. If he goes Tannehill(unlikely but best case) he signs a 30M/year contract with a first year probably less than the 19M they guaranteed him. So where was the financial logic in any of this decision making? 
 

     Giving guarantees to justify a horrible trade is not a requirement in the NFL. It a shotgun to the stomach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Why was it a requirement? Just because the team traded picks for a project. Him only costing 4.7M for a year long tryout was the purpose. What rule says a team must double down on something with no upside. As I’ve explained many times, before this happened and even today, there was no upside. If he goes Tannehill(unlikely but best case) he signs a 30M/year contract with a first year probably less than the 19M they guaranteed him. So where was the financial logic in any of this decision making? 
 

     Giving guarantees to justify a horrible trade is not a requirement in the NFL. It a shotgun to the stomach. 

The trade was based on the belief and expectation that Rhule could turn Darnold around. That could take 1 season, possibly 2. I think the mistake was made before the trade ever happened. Minshew, who was a better project and who I wanted, could have been had for far less. But what was more disturbing was how little film it turns out Rhule actually watched. The Darnold extension, and this is just my personal belief, was based on faith in Rhules abilities to transform him, not on Darnold himself. I fully believe Fitts regrets this even if he isn't publicly saying so. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The trade was based on the belief and expectation that Rhule could turn Darnold around. That could take 1 season, possibly 2. I think the mistake was made before the trade ever happened. Minshew, who was a better project and who I wanted, could have been had for far less. But what was more disturbing was how little film it turns out Rhule actually watched. The Darnold extension, and this is just my personal belief, was based on faith in Rhules abilities to transform him, not on Darnold himself. I fully believe Fitts regrets this even if he isn't publicly saying so. 

 

If it took two, how much do you think it would cost to keep him for that second year? Being that he had to have had an average year , at best, if you need another year to decide. Sure wouldn’t  be 19M. As I’ve said since April, this was the most illogical cap related move I can remember any team making.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...