Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Playoff Games


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup that could have been a blowout if Mcvay didn't go so conservative, especially when Akers is your featured back for whatever reason

I really didn't have an issue with the gameplan. Conservative play calling didn't nearly cost them that game. Four turnovers in in the last 30:15 of that game nearly cost them that game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hard to say without being able to see what he was seeing. They never gave a downfield look. It was 3rd and 15 and wasn't a crazy deep sack so it didn't really hurt them all that bad.

They showed the field, 3 receivers went deep and Knox was the short route. If he hit Knox it would have been a gain of 8-12. Still short but probably better to make that throw than take the sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

They showed the field, 3 receivers went deep and Knox was the short route. If he hit Knox it would have been a gain of 8-12. Still short but probably better to make that throw than take the sack.

Meh, I trashed Teddy for a full year for making those plays. I'm not gonna change my tune now.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

I mean you said ppl ride mahomes..you basically doing the same thing lol

I was mostly talking about announcers and commentators… not so much about the people here. And again what I said was I though Josh’s arm was better than cams. So yeah we can call it riding. To say a qb had a better arm than cam. Not that he’s the best, not that he’s the next coming of Brady. That his arm is better than cams. That can be our measure of riding now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I really didn't have an issue with the gameplan. Conservative play calling didn't nearly cost them that game. Four turnovers in in the last 30:15 of that game nearly cost them that game.

RIght, but 2 of those by Akers who's like 200 pounds running against the Bucs D-line and was averaging like 2 yards a carry when he didn't fumble. I guess they were short on RB options, don't really know their roster that well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...