Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go Get Watson


Recommended Posts

Just now, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

No way cotton balls Tepper didn’t watch divisional weekend. Ain’t winning poo in this league without a star at QB. Do what it takes. It’s time.
 

Let the dookie fly throughout this thread. 

Did you miss the game last night? Where is SFs QB?

Don’t have the money.

Really don’t have the trade capital.

Doubt we have his interest. 
 

Won’t allow us to fix the line.

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wanderlai said:

He is the one X factor QB that can be had possibly. Watching Allen, Burrow, Mahomes be difference makers has me on board. Getting Watson May be all it takes to win the division if Tom and Payton retire. 

This is what people are not understanding. The time is now. Trade for Watson, get some FA olineman and go compete. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I don’t care what other holes we have. Having a franchise QB fixes our biggest need. The rest will fall into place. Rams have been trading draft capital away for half a decade and are fine. I want to win a super bowl. I don’t care about the nuances of a process and future implications. 

That’s how you become the Lions and why Stafford got out of there.

Build the line, tweak the defense and draft a kid. You just have to have the coaching staff to do so.

Watson behind this OL would slightly better than Cam and Darnold this season. Maybe a game or two better.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Watson would not fix the poo-ton of issues that Matt Rhule has created for this team. Paying 3 first round picks for him would only hurt us more. 

We aren't a QB away from being good. We're a QB, OL, and entire coaching staff away. 

Besides all that, do people seriously believe Watson is gonna waive his no-trade clause to come play for this team under Matt Rhule?

If so, you might wanna adjust your meds.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...