Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft BPA

jumpman910

By jumpman910,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jumpman910 Contributor

jumpman910

Posted
Posted

People dogged the Bengals for passing OT need and took the BPA. Just so happens it was Burrow's favorite target 

 

I want ot(Evan neal or Cross) as option 1&2 but if they're gone it's gonna be HARD for Scott to pass on Hamilton. We know he comes from that Earl Thomas eltie secondary cloth. 

And honestly if it's Sam/Cousins/Jimmy G we'll probably be bad again anyways. Let the chips fall where they may. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rubi Experienced

Rubi

Posted
Posted

If we ever want to be relevant again we need a game changing QB

yeh you can build a solid roster around a QB like the Rams/Niners have done etc but I have 0 confidence in Rhule/Fitt/Tepper to be able to do that. 
 

need a QB to mask problems 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted

People love this narrative that they passed on OT need since they passed on Sewell but the fact was they had a decent LT already, it was the rest of the line that was bad.  They probably didn't feel like spending the 5th overall pick on a RT or interior OL.

They actually ending spending three picks in that draft on OL.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jumpman910 Contributor

jumpman910

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People love this narrative that they passed on OT need since they passed on Sewell but the fact was they had a decent LT already, it was the rest of the line that was bad.  They probably didn't feel like spending the 5th overall pick on a RT or interior OL.

They actually ending spending three picks in that draft on OL.

Yeah he just got hurt but still wasn't highly rated as slater/penei 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People love this narrative that they passed on OT need since they passed on Sewell but the fact was they had a decent LT already, it was the rest of the line that was bad.  They probably didn't feel like spending the 5th overall pick on a RT or interior OL.

They actually ending spending three picks in that draft on OL.

There was much printed about how they liked their young bookend tackles, but everyone wanted to listen to their talking head favs on ESPN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Does Canales get a nickname yet?

      By strato · Posted

      That’s not bad.  
    • Hoenheim
      How We All Feel About Bryce...

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      There's a flip side to that, if he has 2 or 3 more great games and we make the playoffs, there's going to a tsunami of momentum to extend him going into next year. If he remains inconsistent, we will all be arguing all off season long. I think he's done enough to where he's going to at the very least, be the starter in 2026. Nothing is going to change that with 7 wins on the board at this point, even if we flame out and lose the remainder of them. We haven't won 7 games  If we win 8 games, that would be our highest win total since the 2017 season. That's very significant. 
    • CPantherKing
      BY with another record

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      GWD is the critical stat for an NFL QB. What you need for perspective is GWD %.  This is how many opportunities he converts. 2023 was 12.5%. 2024 was 33.3%. 2025 is 50%. Career is 28.9%. A consistent playoff winning QB is in the 30% range. A championship caliber QB is in the 40% range. He has been tracking well even with his major limitations under the development of Canales. This is the only reason he is holding on, but he is at the same level of a Derek Carr with the Raiders. Carr was 32.4% GWD in his first 3 seasons with 12 GWD in 37 opportunities. This gives you perspective on why he is frustrating to evaluate. Carr did what for the Raiders? 2 winning seasons in 9 seasons with 4 different HCs/OCs. This is what we want as Panthers fans? A decade of average with potential and many moments of hope? At least he'll win a QB skill competition like Carr, right?
×
×
  • Create New...