Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst Kept Secret at the Senior bowl (Panthers Interest in Pickett)


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I prefer matt corral personally

Im in the "no one" zone, until mid-second at the earliest. By that time feels like Mr. Upside would be the best dart. These "top" QBs feel like career backups/Rosen vibes, stay away if your team has smarts......sadly...well you know.

I do like spending a 5th-7th dart for a lottto ticket, hell he just has to beat out walker. Add a upside Vet and go to battle..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

Only Fitts can save the org from these bad choices and I’m not sure he has the power.

How is Fitts going to save the team from itself? Either he's a yes man with no power, or he's part of the problem based off the trades and free agents that has been made since he's joined the team.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, t96 said:

Was replying directly to points about age and not doing anything in college until year 5, both of which are the same with Burrow and Pickett. Obviously Burrow was a much better prospect.

Burrow didn’t start for 4 years like Pickett. 

He started for 2.  One being the greatest O in NCAA history that brought home a Natty out of the SEC. 

I mean the high for both was year 5.  But the highs aren’t even in the same solar system.   Pickett isn’t even one of the best ACC QBs in the last decade.  

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

It's weird we have this report now. This entire week has been reports of teams cooling on Pickett. 

You may think it's weird, but it makes perfect sense for Tepper's Panthers. Tepper and his brain trust think they are smarter than everyone else, so this works for them.

Joking aside, I still think they take Howell if they go QB at 6. Howell ticks that UNC box that Tepper can use to sell more merch.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...