Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting 2013 QB draft class vibes


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

He don’t want to come here either lol. Didn’t u see he wants to be traded to a contender, so that’s out. Which I don’t want him anyway 

I don't think he really has the sway to dictate his destination like Stafford did or that Watson does with his no trade clause. Jimmy G's options are likely to be more limited. I can't see a contender trading significant assets for him. What would say the Broncos or Steelers be willing to give up for a stop gap? I definitely don't think it would be a 1st.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think he really has the sway to dictate his destination like Stafford did or that Watson does with his no trade clause. Jimmy G's options are likely to be more limited. I can't see a contender trading significant assets for him. What would say the Broncos or Steelers be willing to give up for a stop gap? I definitely don't think it would be a 1st.

Nope I agree I read the 49ers just want second or third for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Nope I agree I read the 49ers just want second or third for him. 

Then a dumbass like Rhule comes screaming in with a 1st and they say, "Sorry Jimmy, you're going to Carolina. Suck it up for a year and then hit free agency. Find a spot to compete for a starting job for a good organization or we'd love to have you back here as a backup."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Welp. The good news is that the Bills picked Manuel and LOOK AT THEM NOW! That’s gotta mean something. 

Tbh, drafting a bad qb in the first isn't the death sentence it used to be.  More and more teams are willing to move on after a couple years, during which time other aspects of the team can grow too.  

I'd still rather not draft Pickett at 6 but oh well.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Tbh, drafting a bad qb in the first isn't the death sentence it used to be.  More and more teams are willing to move on after a couple years, during which time other aspects of the team can grow too.  

I'd still rather not draft Pickett at 6 but oh well.

I’d be much happier with Willis or even Strong. I have no interest in Pickett. He played a weak schedule as a 5th year senior in a bad division. He did what he SHOULD have done as basically the most senior player in the entire conference….

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...