Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns vs Reddick


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not so much which one is better, but which one makes the most sense to resign.  This discussion could actually apply to general team building and whether you should resign your own players or trade them before they become expensive (and get picks) and use that money to sign free agents.

Our choices, and we will assume we don't want to spend the cap to resign both, although I actually think we might.

Let Reddick walk this year, hope to get a 3rd round comp pick (although we haven't shown a propensity to chase comp picks yet under Rhule) and resign Burns next year for $20m a year.  I know $20m sounds high, and some are down on Burns, but in this league if you can get to a QB teams will pay.

or

Sign Reddick for $14m a year and trade Burns for a 1st round pick or maybe some combination of later picks.  Here again I think he would get more on the trade market than some realize.  You always have to factor in the player's contract when accessing their value.  You don't trade a player, you trade their contract and his is really good right now.  He has one year left on a cheap rookie deal and then the 5th year option.  

Should a team consider trading their own players a year early, to get picks and then use the money saved to spend on free agents that really don't cost them a pick outside of the potential compensatory pick.  

We could apply this same logic to Moore.  Should the team pay him $18m a year or trade him for picks and use that $18m for someone like Allen Robinson or Chris Godwin?

If you decide to make a habit a resigning your own players, you should at least play the comp pick game somewhat.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm resigning Burns and letting Reddick walk and taking that comp pick.

How about a third option? Transition to a legit 3-4 scheme and keep both.

 

With Rhule on the hot seat I really don't see him having the discipline to play the comp pick game.  Even if he did that would be next year's comp pick and another coach might get to use it.

I was mostly presenting the question in regard to general team building and which choice helps the team overall and long term, with the situation we are in we probably won't be making decisions with that in mind.

My guess is we resign Reddick and worry about Burns next year because our whole staff knows they might not be here.

I'm actually a bit nervous that we are not only going to overpay other free agents but our own since it has to be viewed a make-or-break year.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philosophically, it is not as easy as one or the other.  You have to look at the players involved, their cost, how fat or thin you are at the position, if you think they will still be productive in 3 years, injury concerns, what you honestly think you will get in return, etc.  It is really a case-by-case basis.  I'd generally prefer to hold onto our own talent, but that doesn't always make the most sense. 

This situation is more of a mess because our defense also regressed after about week three of last season.  That makes it a lot tougher to evaluate.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

 

This situation is more of a mess because our defense also regressed after about week three of last season.  That makes it a lot tougher to evaluate.

IMO a lot of the defensive issues can be mitigated by having an offense that can actually pull their weight and not keep them on the field so much.

I think that had a lot to do with them breaking down both physically and mentally as the season progressed.

Not saying there wasn't some regression, but I think 75% of it was due to the complete lack of complementary football from our offense and to a lesser extent special teams

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Not so much which one is better, but which one makes the most sense to resign.  This discussion could actually apply to general team building and whether you should resign your own players or trade them before they become expensive (and get picks) and use that money to sign free agents.

Our choices, and we will assume we don't want to spend the cap to resign both, although I actually think we might.

Let Reddick walk this year, hope to get a 3rd round comp pick (although we haven't shown a propensity to chase comp picks yet under Rhule) and resign Burns next year for $20m a year.  I know $20m sounds high, and some are down on Burns, but in this league if you can get to a QB teams will pay.

or

Sign Reddick for $14m a year and trade Burns for a 1st round pick or maybe some combination of later picks.  Here again I think he would get more on the trade market than some realize.  You always have to factor in the player's contract when accessing their value.  You don't trade a player, you trade their contract and his is really good right now.  He has one year left on a cheap rookie deal and then the 5th year option.  

Should a team consider trading their own players a year early, to get picks and then use the money saved to spend on free agents that really don't cost them a pick outside of the potential compensatory pick.  

We could apply this same logic to Moore.  Should the team pay him $18m a year or trade him for picks and use that $18m for someone like Allen Robinson or Chris Godwin?

If you decide to make a habit a resigning your own players, you should at least play the comp pick game somewhat.  

 

 

Unfortunately we don't have the coach to play this what if game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

IMO a lot of the defensive issues can be mitigated by having an offense that can actually pull their weight and not keep them on the field so much.

I think that had a lot to do with them breaking down both physically and mentally as the season progressed.

Not saying there wasn't some regression, but I think 75% of it was due to the complete lack of complementary football from our offense and to a lesser extent special teams

I agree with you.  Our offense specialized in 3 and outs, it seemed.  Even if the defense got off the field, having to go out three plays and a punt later didn't do them any favors.

Add it to the list of things that is pretty hard to gauge because the team was so inept in so many phases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm resigning Burns and letting Reddick walk and taking that comp pick.

How about a third option? Transition to a legit 3-4 scheme and keep both.

 

We just tried that a few years ago. I still have nightmares. Love him or not, Rivera is a legit coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Reddick is resigned, would he be worth a first or second rounder next year if he has a similiar season?

Significant more than the third round comp pick he would bring in if not resigned. 

Use the extra 1/2 rounder to move up in the draft next year along with other draft capital. (If the trade partner want him, he could also be included in the trade up)

And go get the QB.

Because that will not be solved this off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

 

This situation is more of a mess because our defense also regressed after about week three of last season.  That makes it a lot tougher to evaluate.

This 1000%. How do you really evaluate this situation? How do you set contracts for the next coach beyond 2022?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

Yeah But with 4-3 personnel. 3-4 works well for many teams but takes a commitment. Not a overnight thing plenty of the top defenses in the league run a 3-4.

Maybe. I’m not sure we had 3-4 or 4-3. Maybe a combo. The real problem I see with this team is lack of a long term plan or lack of leadership to implement said plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I love Kemba but that was the only time MJ being cheap worked out well for the hornets. Paying him a super max would have been one of the worst contracts in NBA history even if his knees didn't give out. That era of the hornets would get smoked by at least 40 by this current roster 
    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
×
×
  • Create New...