Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Vet QB options: A snip from the athletic


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Essentially, our HC is such a dumbass and game planner that he needs a generational talent at QB to save him. Yeah, that seems unlikely. I'm already looking forward to 2023 off season because that's when we can really improve. 

I don't think this forum has ever already started looking at possible 2023 draft/QB options a year in advance. Assuming Rhule doesn't trade away the majority of our 23' draft picks to attempt to save his job

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

All of those players are significantly better than Mariotta or Trubisky(minus Minshew, who is a little bit of a wildcard).

 

Sure but at what cost? Mariotta and Mitch should hopefully be cheaper placeholders. Going all in for a vet at our current state is a bad move IMO. Draft one or draft OL and just get a cheap younger placeholder with a little upside and continue the search. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Sure but at what cost? Mariotta and Mitch should hopefully be cheaper placeholders. Going all in for a vet at our current state is a bad move IMO. Draft one or draft OL and just get a cheap younger placeholder with a little upside and continue the search. 

In our current state, I wouldn't even bother investing in a QB. Fix the OL in the draft and let the next coaching staff figure out QB.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am 100% for Minshew - one big issue I felt like Darnold had was a lack of leadership and confidence - he never looked like he was in charge of that offense on the field.  Minshew did not appear to have that issue...low cost - decent potential - and we still upgrade the line in the draft?  Worst case scenario we still get a good draft pick in 2022 and we don't sacrifice picks like we might he we go after some of these other vet QB's.  Sounds like best case for us right now to me

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minshew has a bit of a Delhomme vibe and while that could be a lot of fun, let's be real about what we need to do.

We need to trot Darnold back out there behind an improved offensive line. Chances are we're still going to suck, but we will have paid for the right to do so and we can get what we have spent on bad QBing behind us. 

Rhule said this was the guy and then made sure he got that second year with the contract extension because the cost was too good to pass up on. Sometimes, when you buy a box full of crap, you've just got to work your way through it. If it costs Rhule his job (and it should have done so already) then so be it.

Any QB we pick up, except for a late rounds draftee, will just saddle this team with long term costs and more short term losses. 

Really, we need to take the keys away from the drunk before he gets back in the car. Since we've declined to drive his ass home, we're just going to have to sit here until he either sobers up or daylight comes and he can find his own way home.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

In our current state, I wouldn't even bother investing in a QB. Fix the OL in the draft and let the next coaching staff figure out QB.

This. 

Had we stuck to the plan to use Bridgewater to fill the gap and audition for the role, we'd be in a different position.  I realize this place would have turned into Chernobyl had they brought him back for 2021, but 2022 was the decision year for him, the way his contract was structured.  If I remember the details right, his salary would have been big, but his residual bonus relatively small (in the area of $5M).  Then they got in a public pi$$ing contest with him and had to abandon that plan.  That created an urgent need/panic for another QB. 

They compounded that by thinking we were only a QB away from showing something, but with our OL we were farther than that and we had a mass regression in 2021, anyway.

Had we not felt the need to go tit-for-tat when Bridgewater complained publicly, we would be 1) sucking up his third year which was only intended to be used if he was the answer, 2) breaking in our new long-term starter, either via trade or the draft, or 3) shopping for a new placeholder with little cap money tied up in the position.  Instead, we are sucking up a year of Darnold at $18.5M while trying to do what is behind door #2 or #3.    And our options for #2 are not great, either because of what is available or what is available at a price we can afford.

The old saying about what to do if you find yourself in a hole applies.  Unless something falls in our lap, suck it up and put the next QB in a position to succeed by building the OL.  That does not bode well for 2022, but IF the OL is addressed and gels, and IF CMC stays healthy, and IF Darnold upgrades his play toward mediocrity, maybe we can get to where we had hoped to be in 2021. 

Otherwise, hand the reins to someone else (at QB and probably HC) next year.  But let's stop lunging at anything that could remotely be an upgrade, unless it does not distract us from trying to put a QB in a position to succeed.  In fairness to Darnold, he may not have that in him, but in our current situation, he can't prove it even if he did.

I see Kyber just posted some very similar thoughts.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...