Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could we really pick something other than QB or o-line at 6?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm so accustomed to watching this organization do mind numbingly stupid things that it's going to be really difficult to shock me with anything.

I wouldn't have believed this in a million years. Now, I'll believe anything. I hate trite sayings, but it's really a damned circus. Our team is competing with Ringling Brothers. Hell, that's probably an insult to the circus, they're competing with carnies!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Verge said:

I really doubt it. Probably next years 3rd and a player. 

Gotta remember, it's Matt Rhule. If THE Sam Darnold is worth a 2nd, 4th, and 6th then Jimmy G for next year's 1st is a steal. An absolute STEAL I tell ya! 😂

Unless by "a player" you mean a Brian Burns or Jeremy Chinn or DJ Moore type player. Oh wee mayne. I could see it. Burns and a 3rd for Jimmy G after we draft a pass rusher #6 overall. Probably that bust looking for a place to happen out of Oregon. 🤢

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, to answer your question, yes we could.

Only because we have the most braindead leadership in the building right now and very little ammo.

All 3 of the tackles being gone at 6 will be hard to swallow.  And the answer to the other question...if the C is a rock star, I'm fine taking him high.  O Line is SO important right now in the league and we seriously need to address it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We SHOULD be completely open to several positions to draft. When you draft in the top 10, you have to get that pick right. So it is significantly more important to get an impact player, than to get a player at a specific position (within reason). Both Hamilton and Thibodeaux give me pause. But other teams may be willing to jump up for them, particularly to get in front of the Giants. So, if the trade is fair, and we can pick up extra value, We should look to move down. Especially if the top tackles are gone. No QB in this draft is worth a top 15 pick, much less a top 6 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...