Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pats have discussed a trade for Robby Anderson with the Panthers at the combine...


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

It’s an easy contract for us to ship and cheap one for the pats to pickup. They cut aglohar and they are basically paying Robby 7mil this year. Then can cut him next year with no penalty.  It’s a win win for both teams

How is “cheap” for the Pats in any way. They would owe him 10M base salary, 2.8M roster bonus, and 5M to trade/10M to cut Aglohar. That’s either 17.8 or 22.8M to replace Aglohar with RA. What math are you using to create this “cheap” scenario. At least your consistent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robby was thrilled to finally get away from Sam. Robby had a good 2020 season only to then see Sam return to being his QB.

Robby mentally checked out once sh!t started going downhill fast. I don’t blame him. Last season isn’t who Robby is. He’ll be good moving forward with any QB not named Darnold

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Robby was thrilled to finally get away from Sam. Robby had a good 2020 season only to then see Sam return to being his QB.

Robby mentally checked out once sh!t started going downhill fast. I don’t blame him. Last season isn’t who Robby is. He’ll be good moving forward with any QB not named Darnold

Darnold isn't out there swatting the ball out of his hands making him lead the league in drops.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...