Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

And also, again, fug MICHAEL THOMAS.  Dude hasn't played in like 2 years.  He and Watson may share an agent, but fug him and the Aint's.

Thomas hasn't played in like 2 years.  Some of their best players on defense are aging out, they are in cap hell, Kamara is in legal trouble, and they just promoted a fuging dud to be their HC with a defensive background.  If he chooses them, it will strictly be due to ownership and a proven, winning organizational model.  That's it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

And also, again, fug MICHAEL THOMAS.  Dude hasn't played in like 2 years.  He and Watson may share an agent, but fug him and the Aint's.

Thomas hasn't played in like 2 years.  Some of their best players on defense are aging out, they are in cap hell, Kamara is in legal trouble, and they just promoted a fuging dud to be their HC with a defensive background.  If he chooses them, it will strictly be due to ownership and a proven, winning organizational model.  That's it.

I still don’t understand why Watson would want to go to a franchise with no money and their head coach just blindly flees…. Something isn’t right down there. 
 

loomis is only doing this to save his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

And also, again, fug MICHAEL THOMAS.  Dude hasn't played in like 2 years.  He and Watson may share an agent, but fug him and the Aint's.

Thomas hasn't played in like 2 years.  Some of their best players on defense are aging out, they are in cap hell, Kamara is in legal trouble, and they just promoted a fuging dud to be their HC with a defensive background.  If he chooses them, it will strictly be due to ownership and a proven, winning organizational model.  That's it.

Damn.  I didn't realize they shared an agent.

Honestly unless we can swing a trade for another QB, I don't know about this season... like what would be the point of watching a Rhule-coached football team with Darnold or GOD FORBID Pickett in the same division where every other team has better coaches and far and away a better QB?

I'll still watch obviously but damn it will just be brutal to sit through

I don't even know which team in our division I hate the most anymore.  Probably the Saints.  I'd rather root for the GOAT Brady than I would the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

If he chooses them, it will strictly be due to ownership and a proven, winning organizational model.  That's it

Haha yeah, those small things.  What a fool

 

But my Verge!  I’m coming home!

 

You can’t outrecruit a terrible owner, which Tepper is.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And also, again, fug MICHAEL THOMAS.  Dude hasn't played in like 2 years.  He and Watson may share an agent, but fug him and the Aint's.

Thomas hasn't played in like 2 years.  Some of their best players on defense are aging out, they are in cap hell, Kamara is in legal trouble, and they just promoted a fuging dud to be their HC with a defensive background.  If he chooses them, it will strictly be due to ownership and a proven, winning organizational model.  That's it.

Well, the Panthers still have a chance to get Kenny Pickett, or Malik Willis. We could just run it back with Sam and try and win it all?

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

Haha yeah, those small things.  What a fool

 

But my Verge!  I’m coming home!

 

You can’t outrecruit a terrible owner, which Tepper is.

So you must have some inside source in the matter, no?  Or are you really here dunking on people over an out of context Michael Jordan gif on Twitter?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malik Willis and Derek Carr (depending on the compensation) are the only other 2 QBs I'd be interested in.  But really I'd rather just run it with Darnold, take our losses, and start again next year.  That is what a smart team would do (unless you were THAT sold on Willis, and if so I'd be okay with it).  

Watson is worth multiple 1sts because he is that damn good at such a young age.  I love Carr and think he's underrated and for the right team, he could win a Super Bowl.  We aren't that team right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...