Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who do you like at QB?


MHS831
 Share

Forget trade backs and veteran trades--who would you like to see as the New QB in 2022?  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Select one:

    • Baker Mayfield
      7
    • Jimmy Garappolo
      8
    • Malik Willis
      31
    • Sam Howell
      12
    • Kenny Pickett
      22
    • Matt Corral
      27
    • Desmond Ridder
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/01/2022 at 03:03 AM

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I should have clarified--I was referring to who do you hope we pick up.  (Rhule, I think, said that we are adding a third QB to the room--just who do you hope that additional QB is?)

None of them. And by that I don't mean I like Darnold or Walker. I just don't want Rhule picking anyone. 

Forced to pick one of them, I'd go Corral followed closely by Willis. Pickett a good way past that, then after that.... nobody. 

I'd rather us focus on LT and don't big up much resources this year on QB. Rhule and Fitt we're dumb enough to pay for Darnold this year, they should be forced to roll with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continue the rebuild.

Trade back with Seattle.  Let them take Willis.  Draft Corral at 9.  Grab a DE, G, or T with the extra pick.

Start Darnold for 9 games.  If we are 4-5 or worse, make the change to Corral.  If we have a winning record after 9 games, wait until we are eliminated and make the switch.

After 2022, we will be off Darnold.  We'll have a decent idea who Corral is.  Our Offense and defense will be in good shape.  And we'll have a full complement of picks.

2022 is dark, but the future is bright (for those with patience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

Continue the rebuild.

Trade back with Seattle.  Let them take Willis.  Draft Corral at 9.  Grab a DE, G, or T with the extra pick.

Start Darnold for 9 games.  If we are 4-5 or worse, make the change to Corral.  If we have a winning record after 9 games, wait until we are eliminated and make the switch.

After 2022, we will be off Darnold.  We'll have a decent idea who Corral is.  Our Offense and defense will be in good shape.  And we'll have a full complement of picks.

2022 is dark, but the future is bright (for those with patience).

If that's the case than we wasted a ton of money on decent free agents.  Why sign all these players if we are playing for 2023.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I should have clarified--I was referring to who do you hope we pick up.  (Rhule, I think, said that we are adding a third QB to the room--just who do you hope that additional QB is?)

In that case, Carson Strong with a Day 3 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestPanthers said:

 

Florio shitting on Rhule, Darnold and the Panthers.

Sims adding some logic to the discussion "Brady wasn't ready - I saw the same play 7 times by the 2nd Q, plus that OLine wasn't v good and they couldn't run the ball".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Florio shitting on Rhule, Darnold and the Panthers.

Sims adding some logic to the discussion "Brady wasn't ready - I saw the same play 7 times by the 2nd Q, plus that OLine wasn't v good and they couldn't run the ball".

There is definitely something to be said about how outmatched Brady was at OC. If we land Icky or Neal Darnold will have no excuses this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

There is definitely something to be said about how outmatched Brady was at OC. If we land Icky or Neal Darnold will have no excuses this year. 

I think it's win-win.

If we draft a LT and Darnold continues to fail then both he and Rhule are out. If we draft a LT and Darnold succeeds then we win football games and (most) fans are happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The business side says go with Willis because of the upside and if he doesn't show progress with this staff start over next year. If the new staff likes Willis let them develop him. 

The personal side don't do a kid that way with this staff. Don't draft him and him get screwed up by this group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
    • Not really buying it because T-mac faces stiffer competition week in and week out. 
×
×
  • Create New...