Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen vs The Draft Prospects


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What do you believe?

Very few people "in the building" have shown they know how to evaluate OLine talent given the 6-7 seasons -  look at the money wasted and lack of production.  If he is then great, it gives you a perceived flexibility in the draft - not proven - still a big risk.

But even if he is capable he is already a versatile guy who can play other positions - and given how shallow our OLine skills are the best option is probably still to take the best LT available and have an inexpensive, high performing OLine for 3-4 more years.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a better question might be if BC has the ability/trajectory to be an elite LG?  Or will he be a good enough tackle?  If he's looks like he'll be the same value as an OT or OG, then I still think you pick the better OL.  

I don't think you can hurt yourself as much if you pick the best LT prospect at 6.  If you WHIFF on a QB.... not only have you missed an elite LT, but you've also screwed up the QB position, again!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, he really didn't look like some stud even if they think he can play LT.  He seems like an alright, serviceable guy.  Long term depth swing lineman, filler LT starter.  

I'm all about it this way:

1. Icky Ekwonu/Charles Cross/Evan Neal

2. Trade Down (no lower than 18-20)

3. Garrett Wilson

4. Corral/Willis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m all for bringing a QB in but who? The FA list is ass. The draft class isn’t great I’d take a flier on Trey Lance and if available in 4th someone like Leavitt or Mateer? I never wanted Dalton back especially at the contract Dan gave him. He’s utterly useless on the field and his cap hit isn’t nothing. He provides nothing.  There’s a lot of bad QB play this year and passing is down. Guys worth trading for are most likely not going to get traded.  As much as many of you don’t want to hear it our best option is to decline the 5th year option. Give Bryce 2026 while we have him under contract. Then in 2027 either sign Bryce (tag would be an option. Don’t repeat the Darnold mistake) or draft another QB and do it all again
    • The league did Jerry Richardson dirty. But Jerry Richardson played himself. He went out of his way at every opportunity to be as subservient to the shield as humanly possible even when the league went out of it's way to make it abundantly crystal clear that they did not want to see Cam Newton be the face of the league to the point they had the refs do their bidding. If Jerry had any backbone he would have taken the gloves off with the league after SB50. But he just took it on the chin.
    • You need to sign of draft a legitimate starter. As long as the o line is intact they can support a rookie. Even a raw one like Sellers. 
×
×
  • Create New...