Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dallas radio


Jaxel
 Share

Recommended Posts

I live in Dallas, and I was listening to local radio, they were talking about how this draft might not be as expensive to trade up because there are so many teams supposably trying to trade down. That's fine, but what made me kind of laugh, their analyst was saying it was possible they could get the 6 pick from us for 24, their second and a fourth... Man they like to dream down here. Lol

 

/Offseason

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, just because of the qb situation but there are some top heavy OTs and DEs, arguably the second two next important positions on the field.

6 for 24, + second and third this year and second next year sounds good.

but anyway you look at it it will suck since it’s basically just making up for Darnold and idiot moves

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We kinda screwed ourselves into taking a shitty trade back so it's possible. Doing mock drafts without trading back for at least a 2nd is really a bummer. I'd trade back a few spots for a 2nd/3rd and trade back again for another 3rd or whatever instead of dropping that far back on the first move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

There's some truth to that about trade value. Without clear class elite talent, it's possible picks go for less. I don't think 24 and a 2nd would do it for 6, but I don't think that kind of move would take 2(3) 1sts and a 2nd either. 

Yeah, those trade ups are very often driven by QB's and this is a bad class.

Plus you have multiple teams with multiple first round draft picks which does water down the value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's part of being patient too. Not rushing players into roles they aren't ready for. Make them earn it. If you convince yourself that "so and so" needs to start because they were a first round pick, even though they have done nothing to earn it, you have set up both team and player for failure. You can convince yourself all day long that "there is no substitute for game experience" but if the guy can't do his job in practice, he can't do it in a game. Not consistently, anyway.  Teams like the Steelers, the Ravens and the Packers ROUTINELY bench rookies to start off with and no one bats an eyelash. Even if the team is losing. Because that's what they do. They have set the precedent. The players have to show they are ready. Then they get their chance. 
    • Let me provide you with some food for thought. Before this "now era" of the NFL, QBs were allowed time to develop. Everyone from the GM to the fans had more patience. QBs were simply better in the old because they were afforded the time to sit, observe and learn. It's no wonder that guys we threw away, or simply didn't want, have had varying degrees of success elsewhere.  Some Huddlers were talking crazy about Jordan Love and Lamar Jackson---just crazy...
    • I think the JAG debates are largely people having vastly different definitions of JAG.  The OG JAG LB debate was James Anderson.  And James Anderson is probably going to be ahead of Shaq on my alltime LB list (it's really close though). 
×
×
  • Create New...