Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Wonderlic Scores


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Pickett and Corral... oof. Anything sub-20 is red flag territory so Ridder and Strong are borderline.

Cam scored a 21 for reference.

Yeah under 20 worries me a little. This test isn’t a be all end all but those bottom scores aren’t solid. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is an older post but…

Counting Mahomes, the last 10 Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks — Tom Brady (33), Nick Foles (29), Peyton Manning (28), Russell Wilson (28), Joe Flacco (27), Eli Manning (39), Aaron Rodgers (35), Drew Brees (28) and Ben Roethlisberger (25) — had an average Wonderlic score of 29.6.

Lamar Jackson 13, Dan Marino 15, Ryan Fitzpatrick 48

Basically doesn’t matter all that much

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Yeah under 20 worries me a little. This test isn’t a be all end all but those bottom scores aren’t solid. 

I thought the test was gone for "reasons".....Plus if i remember right Jeff George, Micheal Vick, and the lowest of low Vince Young each had single digits? I think Vince was like a 3, claim he didnt like the test and never tried to answer any questions after the first couple. It would hard press to find more lively arms than those 3.. The public is not suppose to know the scores, but agents always leak them if their clients score high....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oof with Picketts low physical ceiling and needing 5 years at average college competition to produce a solid season do not want. Watching film breakdowns I feel like Malik already had some NFL worthy mental decisions when scrambling even though he was in a limited system with sub par Wr's. Pickett has a lot of really questionable softballs thrown into zone coverage that would equate to many interceptions in the NFL.  Malik usually throws a to the sidelines kinda thing where only his WR can get it/throwaway play to live for the next down. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's meaningless. 

I wouldnt say that, its a tiny piece of the huge formula... I mean all the answer were/are online and smart agents have perp'd their players to them..... I wonder what Darnold got, given his mental struggles.....bet his agent showed him the answers tho....

I think Fitzmagic got a 49, just look at the big brain on him=

DnPl1LiWwAAzzho.thumb.jpg.80fc3e18d6703d7d2e2a37c81bf4872e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I wouldnt say that, its a tiny piece of the huge formula... I mean all the answer were/are online and smart agents have perp'd their players to them..... I wonder what Darnold got, given his mental struggles.....bet his agent showed him the answers tho....

I think Fitzmagic got a 49, just look at the big brain on him=

DnPl1LiWwAAzzho.thumb.jpg.80fc3e18d6703d7d2e2a37c81bf4872e.jpg

Need I say more.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...