Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Wonderlic Scores


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Pickett and Corral... oof. Anything sub-20 is red flag territory so Ridder and Strong are borderline.

Cam scored a 21 for reference.

Yeah under 20 worries me a little. This test isn’t a be all end all but those bottom scores aren’t solid. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is an older post but…

Counting Mahomes, the last 10 Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks — Tom Brady (33), Nick Foles (29), Peyton Manning (28), Russell Wilson (28), Joe Flacco (27), Eli Manning (39), Aaron Rodgers (35), Drew Brees (28) and Ben Roethlisberger (25) — had an average Wonderlic score of 29.6.

Lamar Jackson 13, Dan Marino 15, Ryan Fitzpatrick 48

Basically doesn’t matter all that much

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Yeah under 20 worries me a little. This test isn’t a be all end all but those bottom scores aren’t solid. 

I thought the test was gone for "reasons".....Plus if i remember right Jeff George, Micheal Vick, and the lowest of low Vince Young each had single digits? I think Vince was like a 3, claim he didnt like the test and never tried to answer any questions after the first couple. It would hard press to find more lively arms than those 3.. The public is not suppose to know the scores, but agents always leak them if their clients score high....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oof with Picketts low physical ceiling and needing 5 years at average college competition to produce a solid season do not want. Watching film breakdowns I feel like Malik already had some NFL worthy mental decisions when scrambling even though he was in a limited system with sub par Wr's. Pickett has a lot of really questionable softballs thrown into zone coverage that would equate to many interceptions in the NFL.  Malik usually throws a to the sidelines kinda thing where only his WR can get it/throwaway play to live for the next down. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's meaningless. 

I wouldnt say that, its a tiny piece of the huge formula... I mean all the answer were/are online and smart agents have perp'd their players to them..... I wonder what Darnold got, given his mental struggles.....bet his agent showed him the answers tho....

I think Fitzmagic got a 49, just look at the big brain on him=

DnPl1LiWwAAzzho.thumb.jpg.80fc3e18d6703d7d2e2a37c81bf4872e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I wouldnt say that, its a tiny piece of the huge formula... I mean all the answer were/are online and smart agents have perp'd their players to them..... I wonder what Darnold got, given his mental struggles.....bet his agent showed him the answers tho....

I think Fitzmagic got a 49, just look at the big brain on him=

DnPl1LiWwAAzzho.thumb.jpg.80fc3e18d6703d7d2e2a37c81bf4872e.jpg

Need I say more.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...