Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chances Matt Corral starts Week 1


Chances that Matt Corral is the starter Week 1  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the chance that Matt Corral is the starter Week 1

    • 75%-100%
      11
    • 50%-75%
      34
    • 25%-50%
      72
    • Less than 25%
      104


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

I think people ate putting to much on a rookie, still. 

Maybe. But rookie QB’s (and WR’s) are much different than they were a decade ago. 

They actually have passing games at the high school level now lol. 
 

Either way, I’m eager to see how this plays out in camp. Can’t wait. Simply having competition with potential at QB is revitalizing. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Varking said:

Just saw this pop up about Trask

 

 

Ok...

But the coaching staff has been impressed with the way he’s taken to the playbook, with about 70% of the offense thrown at him in a three-day span.

“He did great. I thought he was fantastic,” Arians said. “Just the way he processes information. To take it from the first time ever hearing it -- he was throwing it to the right guy. There were some really good, disguised coverages that he saw the first day of his career, so I was really impressed with how he processes information, and he was very accurate.”

Sounds like the Kyle I know they still love him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Ok...

But the coaching staff has been impressed with the way he’s taken to the playbook, with about 70% of the offense thrown at him in a three-day span.

“He did great. I thought he was fantastic,” Arians said. “Just the way he processes information. To take it from the first time ever hearing it -- he was throwing it to the right guy. There were some really good, disguised coverages that he saw the first day of his career, so I was really impressed with how he processes information, and he was very accurate.”

Sounds like the Kyle I know they still love him.

They love him so much hes not even competing for QB2. He is stuck this year as QB3 if Brady doesn't get hurt. And who is this guy they won't move out of the way for him?

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GabbBl00.htm

A guy who threw for 12 touchdowns as a rookie, and thats the most he ever got in a season. 

50 Touchdowns and 47 Interceptions for his career and completes 56% of his passes. Don't go off of what they tell you, go off of what they show you. And what they are showing you is, if he is QB3 for the second year in a row and can't beat out Gabbert, he isn't the future. 

On a 4 year deal he will likely finish year 2 as QB3. So on year 3 he is going to compete for the starting job and go from 3 to 1? Or will he compete with somebody else for QB2? Its not a great look. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers should be patient with Matt Corral and let him develop at a pace that suits his learning curve.

They have him for five years on fairly cheap contracts so there is no need to rush him along and impede what appears on the surface to be a promising career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...