Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King says maybe Brees to Panthers?????


Billy Love
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Agree w this.
Brees got fired for being horrible on TV and now in a PR move attempting to look like he “controls” the situation he talking all sorts of poo like “oh please I got plenty of better options” I’m taking my ball and going home wah wah wah 

typical beta male move here 

Beta recognize beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

By definition, a Christian is not going to openly advocate for laws or lack there of opposing their world view so throwing “nationalist” behind the term is not only redundant but hypocritical as we all vote for what we believe is best for us and society as a whole. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

I might be alone here, but his religious beliefs don’t mean a damn thing to me once he’s behind center. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

why on a personal level?

 

 

he vocally supports and actively pushes the worst of the evangelical dominionist camps like focus on the family and gay conversion, is a willing stooge of the military's propaganda wing and publicizes guantanamo torture facility tours like it's a zoo trip, is an anti-kneeling chud whose first comments after george floyd's murder were about disrespecting the flag. he's fuging gross

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

By definition, a Christian is not going to openly advocate for laws or lack there of opposing their world view so throwing “nationalist” behind the term is not only redundant but hypocritical as we all vote for what we believe is best for us and society as a whole. 

wrong. dominionist movements are a thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Agree w this.
Brees got fired for being horrible on TV and now in a PR move attempting to look like he “controls” the situation he talking all sorts of poo like “oh please I got plenty of better options” I’m taking my ball and going home wah wah wah 

typical beta male move here 

 

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

 

You truly love the sound of your own voice don'tcha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he vocally supports and actively pushes the worst of the evangelical dominionist camps like focus on the family and gay conversion, is a willing stooge of the military's propaganda wing and publicizes guantanamo torture facility tours like it's a zoo trip, is an anti-kneeling chud whose first comments after george floyd's murder were about disrespecting the flag. he's fuging gross

LOL jesus christ dude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

LOL jesus christ dude. 

I understand and accept the fact that people will look the other way for for sports stars when their skills and winning outweigh the stuff you don’t agree with. 
 

The emotional baggage and personal agenda Brees has won’t be swept under the rug any longer because his skills have diminished greatly. Not to mention the guy lied about having hair plugs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also hit the over.  Banking on Man City running up the score and Leeds getting a lucky strike.   
    • Tailed you.  Also Free Play, which is why the risk shows $0.00. Let me look at hoops and get back to you.  Always fade Hubert, haha. 
    • Hard to say right now, but good thinking.  I look at this as the info we need for free agency.  Looks like we are going to free up about $10m so far; watch to see if any contracts (Moehrig, Horn, Brown, etc) are reworked the first week of March.  Then after free agency, we will have a pretty good idea. Right now, to be fair to your question because I am sure you are aware of its timing: In free agency, I see us adding an OT of some sort and drafting one at some point.  It all depends on how they view Ickey, Nijman, and maybe BC.  That OT could be Nijman.  I do not see the future OT--just a stop gap. I see the Panthers signing a free-agent center.  I think the market is strong.  I see Fortner from the Saints as a prime candidate and his salary is estimated at $6m by Spotrac.  the Saints are $42m over the cap, so I doubt they are able to re-sign many of their own.  He will be 28.  I also expect them to re-sign Corbett (depth) at a vet min ($1.5m) deal. I also see free agency as a strong area to get a free safety who can play and is under age 30.  Hawkins, Cook, and Bryant are all around age 27-28, play at a high level, and should be had for about $15m per. EDGE: Arnold Ebiketie is a good value because he gets pressure at a high percentage.  He had 2 sacks and Atlanta just drafted 2 pass rushers last year.   He has a 70+ PFF rating and will (Spotrac) demand about $9m.  While he is not the answer, he is a great third down option with Princely and he would allow for Jones, Scourton, and Princely to develop.
×
×
  • Create New...