Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King says maybe Brees to Panthers?????


Billy Love
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Agree w this.
Brees got fired for being horrible on TV and now in a PR move attempting to look like he “controls” the situation he talking all sorts of poo like “oh please I got plenty of better options” I’m taking my ball and going home wah wah wah 

typical beta male move here 

Beta recognize beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

By definition, a Christian is not going to openly advocate for laws or lack there of opposing their world view so throwing “nationalist” behind the term is not only redundant but hypocritical as we all vote for what we believe is best for us and society as a whole. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

I might be alone here, but his religious beliefs don’t mean a damn thing to me once he’s behind center. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

why on a personal level?

 

 

he vocally supports and actively pushes the worst of the evangelical dominionist camps like focus on the family and gay conversion, is a willing stooge of the military's propaganda wing and publicizes guantanamo torture facility tours like it's a zoo trip, is an anti-kneeling chud whose first comments after george floyd's murder were about disrespecting the flag. he's fuging gross

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

By definition, a Christian is not going to openly advocate for laws or lack there of opposing their world view so throwing “nationalist” behind the term is not only redundant but hypocritical as we all vote for what we believe is best for us and society as a whole. 

wrong. dominionist movements are a thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Agree w this.
Brees got fired for being horrible on TV and now in a PR move attempting to look like he “controls” the situation he talking all sorts of poo like “oh please I got plenty of better options” I’m taking my ball and going home wah wah wah 

typical beta male move here 

 

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Brees was a very solid QB but it a religious nut job and probably a Christian nationalist. No thanks! 

 

You truly love the sound of your own voice don'tcha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he vocally supports and actively pushes the worst of the evangelical dominionist camps like focus on the family and gay conversion, is a willing stooge of the military's propaganda wing and publicizes guantanamo torture facility tours like it's a zoo trip, is an anti-kneeling chud whose first comments after george floyd's murder were about disrespecting the flag. he's fuging gross

LOL jesus christ dude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

LOL jesus christ dude. 

I understand and accept the fact that people will look the other way for for sports stars when their skills and winning outweigh the stuff you don’t agree with. 
 

The emotional baggage and personal agenda Brees has won’t be swept under the rug any longer because his skills have diminished greatly. Not to mention the guy lied about having hair plugs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As expected. Still no reason not to bring in competition via FA or draft. Bryce can be our bridge QB until we find ourselves our franchise QB. 
    • I've been here since the forum started.    It's an X through Fitterer because I couldn't stand him.   Very troll like behavior.      
    • I agree with this, wholeheartedly. Bryce tantalizingly has his moments, even his games. This past Saturday was one of those. He really became the Mouse that Roared after the team fell behind and the o-line started collapsing. And, in truth, I think had the play calling been better at the end, he might well have brought us back into another lead change. Talk about a legendary moment just missed. I'm going to get lambasted for this but as a cautionary tale, I want to just say we're sitting at a spot that the San Diego Chargers were way back in the day. They had a short-ish QB on a rebuilding team that was underwhelming most games, but had some really good moments. They decided instead to take a gamble on drafting someone new and letting that QB, Drew Brees, go find someone more willing to let him develop. They turned around and had a draft debacle with Eli Manning/Phillip Rivers, ending up with Rivers in the end. We've got to remember that Brees wasn't who he would become at that time, it would take a coach willing to open up the offense and give the tough young kid a chance to grow. Rivers would become the poster child for the guy who almost was. Brees will get a gold jacket someday to go with the Saints only Superbowl win. Bryce probably isn't Brees, only one guy was and he barely got the chance to be him. Giving Bryce another season, maybe two, on squad gives us the luxury of testing the waters and the growth.  QBs early in their careers take time. We saw Rogers last night at the end of his career (maybe), sputtering out before he heads to the barn for his spot in the HoF and we have to remember him at his best, after sitting on the bench for three years. And we have to look at the other side of that coin last night, CJ Stroud, a draft classmate of Bryce's who soared out of the gates but who has come to earth since. He's still a good QB with a long runway ahead of him, but his performance under the big spotlight wasn't as strong as Bryce's on this particular weekend. I'm not 100 percent sure Bryce will be the guy. I'd like to see some more fire in the young man, some push, something that shows he can force his will on the other team's defense.  I am, however, seeing a kid that can make the throws, who can improvise and who amazingly can run braver and faster than I really thought he could. I think he needs time, he needs more confidence and he needs more brave coaching. If he doesn't get that here, I think he might find it elsewhere. And we'd find ourselves like the Spanos family, sitting on the couch in February asking Phillip Rivers to pass the chips during the Super Bowl commercial breaks year after year.
×
×
  • Create New...