Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game #4 Canes vs Rangers 7pm Puck Drop


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

Good on Lorentz for showing some fight (no pun intended). Only player trying to win it seems.

Disagree. Domi is not someone you have to fight their battles for. Aho, TT, Svech, ya. You take the game so they don’t. Domi would have destroyed Trouba if Lorentz hadn’t have fuged it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Both were save able... He was sluh slow and down to low too early.... #Anderson please come back. 

 

 

Raanta is fine. He needs a rest. Put the backup in and let them roll and let Raanta get rest going back home. I said this before this series even started. We can’t rely on Raanta solely. He’s old(by hockey standards). 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Disagree. Domi is not someone you have to fight their battles for. Aho, TT, Svech, ya. You take the game so they don’t. Domi would have destroyed Trouba if Lorentz hadn’t have fuged it up.

I was more so commenting on someone trying to step up and have an impact. Team has no energy and at least Lorentz is trying. Team is way too passive and they're getting pushed around. 

ESPECIALLY since Reaves said his intent this game was to get in people's faces. Can't get pushed around.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

You serious???

There aren’t a different set of rules just because a player is in a vulnerable position… for example, Foegele was penalized a few years ago for boarding Oshie after Oshie slipped. It doesn’t matter that Oshie slipped… it still resulted in him being boarded.

Not to mention, Trouba was completely off the ice, that’s automatically a charge.

Domi bent. Troubas feet were on the ice, no launch.. nothing to see here. 

that 5 Warren got was a terrible call  I think a Caps fan would begrudgingly agree 

 

Edited by trueblue
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zacka77ack said:

I was more so commenting on someone trying to step up and have an impact. Team has no energy and at least Lorentz is trying. Team is way too passive and they're getting pushed around. 

ESPECIALLY since Reaves said his intent this game was to get in people's faces. Can't get pushed around.

That I agree. It was just a boneheaded play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...