Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Snow on Marquis Haynes


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

No Way GIF by GIPHY News

Next coach needs to be a retread or a guy with years and years of NFL experience. I'd love to grab someone from the Shanahan tree especially if Mike McDaniel flourishes in Miami.

INB4 Tepper hires Lincoln Riley for 8 years, $240 mil.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, trueblade said:

No Way GIF by GIPHY News

Next coach needs to be a retread or a guy with years and years of NFL experience. I'd love to grab someone from the Shanahan tree especially if Mike McDaniel flourishes in Miami.

I kind of like Kiffin.  He is doing great at Ole Miss where his teams have been outclassed with some SECW juggernauts.  The Raiders thing was a mess to begin with and he was pretty openly against drafting Jamarcus Russell number 1, but it's what ownership wanted.  Not to mention rookies got paid stupid money back then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I kind of like Kiffin.  He is doing great at Ole Miss where his teams have been outclassed with some SECW juggernauts.  The Raiders thing was a mess to begin with and he was pretty openly against drafting Jamarcus Russell number 1, but it's what ownership wanted.  Not to mention rookies got paid stupid money back then. 

I just don't want another college coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

Good for Haynes. Seems like he could find a solid role here but I am highly suspect that it is more than a part time role at this point in his career.

I liked Snow coming in. He just hasn't adapted his philosophy successfully to the NFL yet. Good eye for DBs for sure, might even call it a fetish at this point. The run game allowed still looks bad until he changes up more than personnel.

We were a top defensive unit, you're going to wear a defense out when the starting QB has 9 passing touchdowns, and 13 interceptions in the games he's played. 

The offense did the defense NO favors, complimentary football did not exist. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

We were a top defensive unit, you're going to wear a defense out when the starting QB has 9 passing touchdowns, and 13 interceptions in the games he's played. 

The offense did the defense NO favors, complimentary football did not exist. 

Only in yards allowed and it was exposed early. Just run and no one needed to do too much with how bad the O was at scoring. The top D shtick is way overplayed around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Just stating my preference. I hear people do that on message boards...

All in how it's worded.  

No worries, was just giving ya poo. 

Seriously though, there are only so many NFL coaches available, and they get replaced by......

Wait for it.....

College coaches. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haynes and Luvu are two players that would constantly flash on screen in limited snaps; I'm excited to see them take on more prominent roles.  Hell, with Burns locking down one DE position and guys like YGM/Haynes/Luvu rotating into the other spot, I'm fairly comfortable with our edge rushers.  That's not even factoring in the chances of a guy like Barno coming in and earning a decent chunk of playing time as a rookie.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...