Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Receiver


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

It's a shame Sam can't get it together. Dude throws the ball so well.

 

10 hours ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

He has all the tools to be a great QB. Great size and great arm. Too bad a kindergartener can read a Harry Potter book better than he could read defense 

Sam is only good for Practice reps for the Wide Receivers, Tight-Ends, and Pass-Catching Running Backs, it seems.

If he doesn't have to read the defense, he's golden.

Unfortunately for him, in the NFL, reading defenses is one of (if not, *THE*) top requirements of being an NFL QB. 

He said that he's growing in confidence under McAdoo's system....it's easy to do that when all he has to do is just throw the ball in a controlled environment. 

 

But who knows?  He might shock the world this season if he even starts looking "competent" when he's out there.   Maybe McAdoo dumbs down the offense to the point where even Sam could resemble an NFL QB?   (not holding my breath but....at the same time, I'd rather not throw Corral out there just yet)

 

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

 

Sam is only good for Practice reps for the Wide Receivers, Tight-Ends, and Pass-Catching Running Backs, it seems.

If he doesn't have to read the defense, he's golden.

Unfortunately for him, in the NFL, reading defenses is one of (if not, *THE*) top requirements of being an NFL QB. 

He said that he's growing in confidence under McAdoo's system....it's easy to do that when all he has to do is just throw the ball in a controlled environment. 

 

But who knows?  He might shock the world this season if he even starts looking "competent" when he's out there.   Maybe McAdoo dumbs down the offense to the point where even Sam could resemble an NFL QB?   (not holding my breath but....at the same time, I'd rather not throw Corral out there just yet)

Yep. It's when the bullets are live that Sam falls apart. If the light suddenly came on this deep into his career, it would be the outlier of all outliers.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yep. It's when the bullets are live that Sam falls apart. If the light suddenly came on this deep into his career, it would be the outlier of all outliers.

You and me would both have their jaws permanently dropped to the ground if that happened, that's for sure.  lol

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, did you see this part in the latest Panther-Bot News link?

https://www.panthers.com/news/minicamp-wrap-roster-competitive-ekwonu-darnold-jaycee-donte-corral

 

— It's tempting to dismiss the praise of Darnold as coachspeak, but he's clearly had a better offseason.

Part of that stems from him spending more time here, absorbing new coordinator Ben McAdoo's playbook. It's not that he didn't study a year ago, but this work has been more focused.

Darnold has always had the talent to play the position, but on the field (in shorts and against a defense that doesn't get to hit), he has been better. Specifically, he connected on more deep balls as the sessions wore on. There was more of a sense of presence from him. One day during OTAs, when practice got a little loose, Darnold called the team to huddle up, and they responded. It was the kind of thing a leader does. Rookie Matt Corral also said Darnold had been a good mentor for him, helping him understand the (vast) differences between the college game and his new role.

Darnold still has a lot to prove. But to dismiss the progress he's made would be unfair.

 

I dismiss the progress because, like I CORRECTLY pointed out : It's a controlled environment.

Hell...even in the article, it points out "in shorts and against a defense THAT DOESN'T GET TO HIT".

So I take any so-called "Progress" with a microscopic grain of salt here.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

He has all the tools to be a great QB. Great size and great arm. Too bad a kindergartener can read a Harry Potter book better than he could read defense 

See, I don't think that's it. I think its a processing speed issue. He will look at a wide open receiver and he has this pause, then he goes to the next read. It's a yip, perhaps from getting the poo knocked out of him for four straight seasons, but it doesn't matter. He's unfixable at this point.

Only a sports psychologist and maybe a hypnotist could fix him at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Darnold were just mediocre but showed heart and actual leadership he might be at least likeable despite the circumstances. Instead he is horrible and walks back to the bench by himself to mope after throwing pick sixes that put his teammates and his defense in very bad situations. Anyone hyping his performance in camp is not fit to discuss football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...