Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Add sexual assault to the Dan Snyder allegations


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

But it would have been far more interesting to see an NFL ouster play out in the court system had Richardson not caved. Let's not forget the NFL has never had their hands forced. With JR, the league simply took him in a back room and twisted his arm a little- it never came to a formal convening of the Executive Committee for a vote.

As a matter of fact, the league went out of its way to issue a statement saying they were not forcing Richardson out.

I'm not even sure they twisted his arm.

Richardson had a really weird loyalty to the league. From the outside looking in, it seemed pretty one-sided.

Doesn't seem like he ever saw it that way though.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Fair enough and I am willing to concede that there may be a few instances of when an NDA is ethical and necessary - but I am also an advocate of transparency and protecting workers. 
 

NDAs used by wealthy people/corps to protecting themselves stuffing money in someone’s mouth to cover up illegal, unethical, and shady activities need to 100% be illegal in this country. But everyone knows rich people play by a different set of rules. 

NDAs are really common. I sign one probably once every couple months or so.

In this case, you have a situation of "here's $1.6 million to sign this NDA." She had a choice. Was it shitty, yeah of course, but still a choice nonetheless. Perhaps there should be a law that NDA's are void if used to cover up a crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

NDAs are really common. I sign one probably once every couple months or so.

In this case, you have a situation of "here's $1.6 million to sign this NDA." She had a choice. Was it shitty, yeah of course, but still a choice nonetheless. Perhaps there should be a law that NDA's are void if used to cover up a crime.

I primarily get sent documents via email, so it's very rare that I don't edit the NDA's before signing and returning. Has never been noticed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

No they dont... intellectual property is not a real thing.

NDAs are about confidentiality. It’s not always about intellectual property.

The first NDA I ever signed was when I worked in my Dads friends law firm as an errand runner. The NDA kept me from talking about any juicing and personal stuff I read, saw, heard about clients and their cases. Important in child and family law.

Again, NDAs are perfect for specific situations. 

When something is broken, you don’t have to throw the entire thing out. You can just fix what’s broken and keep what works. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tbe said:

NDAs are about confidentiality. It’s not always about intellectual property.

The first NDA I ever signed was when I worked in my Dads friends law firm as an errand runner. The NDA kept me from talking about any juicing and personal stuff I read, saw, heard about clients and their cases. Important in child and family law.

Again, NDAs are perfect for specific situations. 

When something is broken, you don’t have to throw the entire thing out. You can just fix what’s broken and keep what works. 

Your dad's friend violated attorney client privilege by letting you read, see or hear anything about clients and their cases.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tbe said:

NDAs are about confidentiality. It’s not always about intellectual property.

The first NDA I ever signed was when I worked in my Dads friends law firm as an errand runner. The NDA kept me from talking about any juicing and personal stuff I read, saw, heard about clients and their cases. Important in child and family law.

Again, NDAs are perfect for specific situations. 

When something is broken, you don’t have to throw the entire thing out. You can just fix what’s broken and keep what works. 

what type of bullshit law firm let’s their yo-boy get in on ths type of privileged information. 
 

NDAs are bullshit. People and companies just hiding stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Your dad's friend violated attorney client privilege by letting you read, see or hear anything about clients and their cases.

He didn't say they let him do anything, but you can accidentally see and hear a lot of things just walking around law offices.

(my brother and his wife both worked for attorneys)

What he signed sounds like a "just in case" type document.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

what type of bullshit law firm let’s their yo-boy get in on ths type of privileged information. 
 

NDAs are bullshit. People and companies just hiding stuff


It was in Raleigh. Run by 8 UNC law grads.

I was often in court (closed hearings) getting stuff for people, serving subpoenas sometimes, bringing stuff in and out of conference rooms when stuff was being discussed, filing tons of paperwork, making copies, ect. 


It was a small shop. I saw a lot. Just accept there are areas of life you don’t know a much about.

Now I was making $9 hour at the time so there wasn’t much they could realistically do if I made something public about Mr big shot’s divorce and custody fight, but I understand why that stuff is needed sometimes.

These days I work with companies that put years of their lives creating something and they don’t want some idiot contractor like me selling their hard won ideas/strategies/tactics/customer lists/financial info/ect to competitors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...