Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

Baker is better than Sam, but I have a feeling BOA is going to be empty by the middle of the season. That's a lot money to spend on the QB position for an empty stadium. This plan had better work or that could be it for Rhule and Fitt imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Cool....So what happens if corral looks better in camp?

I highly doubt a rookie will look better than a vet in camp.

2 hours ago, shaq said:

There’s nothing wrong with a 3rd round rookie QB riding the bench for a year.

This right here. Corral isn't going anywhere.

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mayfield is under contract for one year.

Nothing about this trade makes Corral a wasted pick.

Yep.

1 hour ago, Silent Majority said:

Unless Mayfield BALLS OUT, this will set us back at the QB position and muddy yet another draft next season. Foolish seems to be the #newnormal at 1 Panther Place

How will it muddy anything? We have Corral. What, you expected a Super Bowl this season?

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The plan should be, if we truly had a first round grade on him, would be to have Ben M build an offense around MC that wouldnt overwhelm him in week 1 and build from there.  Give him every fuging rep you can in practice and at least see what you have.  At some point in the season you will have an pretty concrete idea if he can play and grasp what you are trying to accomplish.  If so awesome you ahve a cheap qb to build around, if not and he is a disaster draft another one.  This isnt hard

You can do all of that next year too. Corral is a baby. If Baker BALLS OUT ... well that's a pretty good problem to have, no? Great QB play with a possibly great backup? Every GM in the league would want that.

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

BTW in  2020, Bakers only playoff year,  Cleveland's OL was #1 overall, at the end of season.

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-final-2020-offensive-line-rankings

 

And now he has a decent one again.

21 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

The direction? The direction?

Reverse Austin Powers GIF

Corral isn't going ... anywhere. We are the SAME team, just with a better QB than last year.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’ve said it before that Corral’s development was one way to ensure another Rhule year. He doesn’t have to make the playoffs if Corral looks like he’ll become a good QB. Darnold in the easy stretch and Corral in our hard stretch wasn’t going to win a lot so top 3 was absolutely in play. You also forget our depth is atrocious. A couple key injuries and we are potentially the worst team in the league.

With Mayfield, if we don’t make the playoffs (very possible), Rhule’s gone. No rookie development can save him.

Dude rookie qbs lighting the stat sheet up are very rare, you really don’t want to bet on a 3rd round rookie saving the day. Also, my least concern is Rhule saving his job dude. I understand where your coming from and I wish we had traded for Baker prior to the draft but for what we gave up it’s a great trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s my problem with the trade. IMHO, it just makes you realize how bad we’ve been and continue to be at building a team. I mean look at how many OL we passed over who’ve been studs and how even with 2 FAs and the #6 pick, still have two question marks in 2023, all because until this off-season we didn’t think OL mattered. Just like we thought we could make the playoffs with a retread QB, now in year 3 of said retread strategy. Checkers indeed.

At this point, I don't really think there are too many of us left who have high expectations of Rhule or his strategic planning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

clown show franchise and now everyone is teeing off on us

You realize 2 of the 4 posts you quoted are compliments?  One calls us a playoff team (which I'm not sure I agree with) and the other says Baker is about to light the Browns on fire week 1.  

 

8 minutes ago, rayzor said:

For maybe one or two games before we see how bad he is and we're banging our heads against the wall or coming up with excuses for him. 

Sheer desperation move and you'd think we have learned better than to go digging through dumpsters to find our QB.

 

 

The we lost $5 million this year and a 5th round (or later) pick next year and will probably get a higher comp pick for letting him become a FA as @CanadianCatstated.  Super low risk move by us.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Call Me James said:

I think Baker will do well here. He shaved his contract so he's probably got a gentlemans agreement that if he does well this season we will give him the big bag.

I think he has some performance incentives in his contract. How do you put them in someone’s contract, he has to be starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

2 of those tweets are postive, one is a meme, and the other is joke about Baker dissing cleveland. Not sure how we are being teed off on...

Especially the one about how we are a Playoffs team with "2020 Baker" ... when many on this board want 2015 Cam to have one more shot lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, shaq said:

Dude rookie qbs lighting the stat sheet up are very rare, you really don’t want to bet on a 3rd round rookie saving the day. Also, my least concern is Rhule saving his job dude. I understand where your coming from and I wish we had traded for Baker prior to the draft but for what we gave up it’s a great trade.

We would have paid a lot more in picks and cash.  With Corral in the stable, we had  more leverage.  Grabbing Corral first got us  Baker on the cheap, which is the way it should be.

We're going to find how good Baker is with less help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker is QB1 for 2022

Corral projects to be QB1 for 2023

Let the rookie who has room to grow, learn in the film room, under minimal expectations and a year to adjust to the speed of the NFL. 

We're paying $24M for our starting QB. Not great.....but by no means the worst. Baker is a bit better than Darnold and with a chip on his shoulder, is a win-win for us. If Baker is as awful as everyone thinks, we're barely out any assets, and Rhule is for sure not here beyond 2022.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

But like I told LG elsewhere, at least the guy who's constantly predicting Newton is coming back and having an MVP season is probably gonna be down for the count after this.

Nah. He, like Cooter used to do, will flood every game day thread about Cam if Baker plays poorly. Luckily we can all now talk about Corral instead of Cam if Baker poos the bed! The new era is here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...