Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns and Panther Fan Reactions to the Baker Mayfield Trade

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

Better than Darnold. I’d prefer to just let Corral play, but I’d much rather have Baker than Darnold. 

It's a push between the two for me.  But Baker will pull off enough wins to keep rhule around and get his franchise extension money for getting the team to 8 or 9 wins.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's a push between the two for me.  But Baker will pull off enough wins to keep rhule around and get his franchise extension money for getting the team to 8 or 9 wins.

Six wins definitely buys Rhule another decade. But while this *could* be an eight-win roster if literally everything goes well, they still have to pay a Rhule tax. And that's several close losses. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's a push between the two for me.  But Baker will pull off enough wins to keep rhule around and get his franchise extension money for getting the team to 8 or 9 wins.

Yea that’s the worst case scenario, but he did take the Browns to the playoffs. Who knows. Either he sucks and Corral goes in early, he’s meh and Corral sits for a year and we start actually trying next year, or he’s good and Corral sits til he isn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Yea that’s the worst case scenario, but he did take the Browns to the playoffs. Who knows. Either he sucks and Corral goes in early, he’s meh and Corral sits for a year and we start actually trying next year, or he’s good and Corral sits til he isn’t. 

He will be meh, but that's an improvement over what we've seen so far.  He will improve the team just enough to get his extension.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I hate it, he is no better than Darnold, but he will somehow win more games with the same roster as Darnold???  I don't understand....

He’s definitely better than Darnold. How much better, we’ll see. He’ll have a much better oline than Darnold, that’s for sure. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      This has to be bitached about, those biased refs

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

    • TD alt
      DJ Moore trade talk

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • ImfromClayton
      OK, now it's time to discuss a couple of yesterday's problems. Let's talk "Evero."

      By ImfromClayton · Posted

      IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...