Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Skip Bayless on the Panthers


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s pretty obvious the talking heads on ESPN are setting it up so if Baker does well. YAY!! Baker saved the day, and if he doesn’t, well the panthers are the worst team in the league. What’d you expect?

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's real.

I disagree with him though. I think the best free agent addition from this offseason is Denzel Perryman 😐

For about two seconds, I was like "Why is Scot posting old sh¡t?" Then I had to look at it a little closer and listen again. 

That's terrible. I hope that something isn't going on cognitively with Bayless. Hopefully it's just a case of him being an underprepared tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Skip also doesn't think Matt Rhule and the clownshow (his words but also mine lol) will actually play Baker right away.  Thinks Baker doesn't come on until week 5 or so after another Sam implosion.    

No way in hell Baker don't start Week 1. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's real.

I disagree with him though. I think the best free agent addition from this offseason is Denzel Perryman 😐

We sure could use him right about now actually. Our LBs are going to be a huge weak link all season. Hopefully Luvu steps into a starting role and plays well. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...