Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The other top tackles...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

“Your honor may I present exhibit B”

We have replaced 4 of the 5 starters from this time last year.  The only one left is Moton.  We also greatly upgraded our oline coach.  You're delusional if you think it's the same line as last year.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Are you suggesting we play Ickey at guard with that statement? He will be the LT week 1. Not sure why there would be any doubt by anyone here.

Could it be because BC sat behind, literally, the worst starting oline players in the fuging league only for Rhule’s fat 10 million dollar ass to admit he should’ve played him more after the season was over when meanwhile all us beer bellied fans were all screaming midseason to stop the idiocy?

seriously wtf are you even taking about?

  • Flames 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Icky will start at LT if he’s ready, if he’s not Brady will.  Rhule needs to win to keep his job, and if the rookie isn’t ready to keep Baker clean then they need to go with the bpa.  There is a learning curve to playing in the NFL, Evan Neal (playing RT) is getting beat like a drum in Giants camp.  It’s still early, let’s see how Icky looks by preseason game 3..  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, according to the huddle, BC is a Canton-bound franchise LT, and we're not mad that we drafted Ickey, but we're mad because he's not getting all the precious 1st string reps ahead of our incumbent franchise LT? 

It's confusing. Can we just stick to calling Matt Rhule fat?

Edited by Khaki Lackey
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Khaki Lackey said:

So, according to the huddle, BC is a Canton-bound franchise LT, and we're not mad that we drafted Ickey, but we're mad because he's not getting all the precious 1st string reps ahead of our franchise LT? 

It's confusing. Can we just stick to calling Matt Rhule fat?

I must have missed that vote.  I've not seen one person proclaim anything close to resembling that claim. 

All I've said is that either he's showing he's able to do a good job there or the rookie isn't ready. From the looks of it it's both. But whatever. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

From the article...

 

“To me, Ickey’s a rookie. He’s gotta earn everything he gets, and he’s got a long way to go,” Rhule said. “He does some things really well naturally. He’s unbelievably powerful and talented. But there’s a lot to this game. There’s a lot of nuances and techniques and all those things. He has a long way to go. He’ll get there, but every day he’s gotta work.”

Spoken like a guy who came right out of college and became a Head Coach... hypocrite.

Edited by Khyber53
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not a Bryce hater and I would 100% move on.  Especially looking at how the upcoming qb draft looks on paper.  Hopefully he continues to improve but if in 3 seasons you're still chasing average season numbers then he's not going to be the guy.  You've just got to keep taking swings until you hit.  Average qbs without any elite physical traits cant get it done anymore.  So this year Hopefully he continues to develop and is above average statistically.
    • Meltdowns???? He was pulled by Canales because he wasn't executing the game plan after 2 games into the season so he could watch Dalton execute the offense and show Bryce the windows available in the NFL, how to push the ball down the field and how to step up and move around when blitzed. When Young came back 5 games later he clearly watched and improved. Enough he was named the future starter. He doesn't have a history of  meltdowns nor is there any reason to assume he will have one. From what I have read he is mentally strong and emotional stable. He may have bad games down the road, everyone does. But this is all a learning experience for him and so far he seems to be making progress. I can understand being hesitant on anything Panthers, but Young has surprisingly been able to gain his confidence after a disastrous start. You aren't alone in being cautious but I think he is the future. I thought he was too small and too short to succeed in the NFL. Honestly I was pleasantly surprised last year and am optimistic about the offense for the first time since Wilks and Dalton were decent.
    • The Rams wanted to trade up for Williams who they ended up within the end. They even told him that when they called him to let him know he is the pick. The other teams are only an assumption. Like the Cowboys, who took a guard. The truth is the team wanted to trade down first and foremost but couldn't get an offer the were happy with. They took McMillan because they felt he was bpa at 8 plain and simple. 
×
×
  • Create New...