Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers apparently ARE looking to off load Darnold...or maybe not. Tweet removed and report denied.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So we are fuging up getting baker to speed and corrals development so we can get a 6th or 7th round draft pick.   Rhule is playing 3d chess fellas

The pick isn't what matters. Hell, we should throw in a 7h round pick! What matters is offloading his salary and cap hit, which we'd take if we cut him.

 

I have said elsewhere, we should all be rooting for Sam to show out in Training Camp and the Pre-Season so when Stafford's arm doesn't get better, Sam is worth a look.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Captroop said:

The pick isn't what matters. Hell, we should throw in a 7h round pick! What matters is offloading his salary and cap hit, which we'd take if we cut him.

 

I have said elsewhere, we should all be rooting for Sam to show out in Training Camp and the Pre-Season so when Stafford's arm doesn't get better, Sam is worth a look.

For some odd reason media are just ignoring the Stafford thing but National guys are starting to ask questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I’ll give him credit he did donate to the charities that Brown fans made the bet with.

also I’m willing to bet that Ben was talking with someone from the national media since they are there today.

To be clear, I'm not saying it isn't true. Heck, it makes sense.

It's just a trust thing. Albright definitely isn't always wrong. He's just wrong frequently enough that I like to see corroboration for some things that he reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Lol we are the only trade partners for Sam Darnold

I could see San Francisco making a play for him if we eat a bunch of his salary.  I remember hearing they were interested in him last year.  He could be a good back up to Lance, assuming they dump Jimmy G one of these days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

I could see San Francisco making a play for him if we eat a bunch of his salary.  I remember hearing they were interested in him last year.  He could be a good back up to Lance, assuming they dump Jimmy G one of these days. 

Take it with a grain of salt but Florio was talking today that there are durability concerns for Lance coming out of San Fran camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Like Stafford?

Good QB to a very well built team. No issue. I think Darnold could be an Andy with a well built team around him. That we do not have. If you put Darnold in Dallas they’d be looking at a deep seed but no win. 
 

My issue with this team is we are always value as underdogs, such as ourselves, because we build poo rosters 

Stafford issue is he stayed with a poo organization too long because he valued friendship. Stafford is basically Brady junior but that’s besides the point. 
 

We need to offload Rhule we need to see what Matt can do BEFORE that and use mayfield as a go between.

Im sorry but this organization is ass, and until Rhule wins an owl or is gone I have no interest in conversating pre-game. Regression ducking sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Good QB to a very well built team. No issue. I think Darnold could be an Andy with a well built team around him. That we do not have. If you put Darnold in Dallas they’d be looking at a deep seed but no win. 
 

My issue with this team is we are always value as underdogs, such as ourselves, because we build poo rosters 

Stafford issue is he stayed with a poo organization too long because he valued friendship. Stafford is basically Brady junior but that’s besides the point. 
 

We need to offload Rhule we need to see what Matt can do BEFORE that and use mayfield as a go between.

Im sorry but this organization is ass, and until Rhule wins an owl or is gone I have no interest in conversating pre-game. Regression ducking sucks. 

My bad I should have clarified I mean in the sense that Stafford isn’t healthy right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can only polish a terd so much... we were the only idiots willing to trade for him, now add on even more terrible game play footage from last year and they expect someone to want him now???? 

He won't be in the league after his contract is up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll have to attach a late rounder and pay most of his contract, which we're paying if we don't trade him anyways.  

Darnold+6th for a 6th, we pay the majority of the contract, but can't still net a gain in cap space if a team is willing to pay 2-5 mil of his option.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...