Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simms is right on the money re the competition


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Except he's wrong on facts...

Simms cites Darnold as knowing the offense better, when in truth the only advantage Darnold has is the two weeks from OTAs. That's not enough to gain any serious leverage.

And while Simms may indeed be a "professional quarterback", there are plenty of other professional football people who disagree.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Except he's wrong on facts...

Simms cites Darnold as knowing the offense better, when in truth the only advantage Darnold has is the two weeks from OTAs.

That's not enough to gain any serious leverage.

The literal point of these shows is to argue different positions.   Whether they always believe them or not. 

and yeah, it basically is Simms acknowledging  what everyone else knows.  Baker is better and should start.  Forced to argue the counter point of why he doesn’t have the job right now.   

Baker not being elite is also irrelevant.  He should be given the job because he is clearly better.  A high end backup is better than Sam. An average starter is a no brainer over Sam.   

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Steelo Senpai said:

This facade will be over with soon enough.  Camp reps don't bother me as much as, obviously, a bunch other people.  The cream is rising to the top day by day.  A good performance on Saturday and then put a bowtie on it during patriots week and call it a day.

I bet they hardly play if at all this weekend.  

he will probably say he didn’t want to put them out there with all second string.   Because who wants the actual starting lineup playing through a fake competition for 2 different QBs in the first preseason game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Except he's wrong on facts...

Simms cites Darnold as knowing the offense better, when in truth the only advantage Darnold has is the two weeks from OTAs. That's not enough to gain any serious leverage.

And while Simms may indeed be a "professional quarterback", there are plenty of other professional football people who disagree.

No, he has all the weeks since OTAs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Except he's wrong on facts...

Simms cites Darnold as knowing the offense better, when in truth the only advantage Darnold has is the two weeks from OTAs. That's not enough to gain any serious leverage.

And while Simms may indeed be a "professional quarterback", there are plenty of other professional football people who disagree.

Would Darnold not have had the playbook that whole time though? He participated in OTAs and had over a month head start on studying the playbook. I'd say he should've had a leg up on knowing the offense better. And whether that's the case or not, those aren't "facts" that Simms can be wrong on. It's subjective and none of us have any idea how well either of those guys know the offense. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I bet both qbs play this weekend and let's see how they do. I can't imagine we won't play Baker and Darnold given the supposed competition.

that’s means you have to play the starters the entire time Sam and Baker would be competing? Who wants that?  It would double up the time you play our starters in a meaningless preseason game 1.    It’s not a comp if one is with the 1s and one is with the 2s the next series. 
 


 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1. TMac arguably the best WR in the draft Round 2. Scour ton mentioned as a possible 1st round edge.     Texas A&M did not use him the same way Purdue did. After the 2023 season he was listed as a first round grade. I believe had Texas A&M used him like they did at Purdue he never makes it out of round 1. Round 3 Princely Umanmielen, we'll go by Princely.  Another highly graded player we got in a lower round. As the video suggests, even if he plays only on passing down it's a positive. Give him a couple of years to develop a he could be a three down player.  Round 4a Etienne IMO a huge upgrade over Blackshear. I can see him in a similar role as CMC without the heavy workload. He can run in between the tackles and has some shifty moves. Give Canales some flexibility. A fellow huddler pointed out UGA running backs don't see the field if they cannot pick up the blitz. Really good pick. Round 4b Ransom a hard hitting safety that has played three different positions on defense. Great pick Round 5a Cam Jackson a massive NT in round 5. I believe a solid rotational pick in a lower round. We added a beast that could make offenses quiver when he's lined up with Brown. Great Value  Round 5b Evans This is another player that can block and has good hands. He also had better seasons before 2024. As a rookie he's probably leaps and bounds better than Ian Thomas. I think he gives us a three headed monster at TE.  Round 6 Horn Jr. Many believe he's just going to be a KR/PR player. I believe there are going to be packages for him to get on the field as a WR. His speed with TMac and Thielen in the slot could be special. I'm really looking forward to seeing him in training camp. I've watched some film and he is very explosive.  Overall I love our picks. I honestly believe all of them will contribute this season. I don't believe we reached on one player in this draft.  This weekend we get a small look at these rookies     
    • You joke, but hasn't basically the whole team been in Charlotte this past week together? I'm not one to see the random dumb stuff players put out on social media in the offseason and think it means that's ALL they've been doing and not working on their game.  But it's a little strange that all this is coming out at the same time we're seeing tons of stuff with the team in Charlotte together, even if it's just working out and not even official team OTA's or anything. So he gets a pass from me saying anything now, but if he doesn't show clear improvement this season, it then opens him up to some retroactive criticism for some things.
    • Ha-ha, I bet that went through everyone's mind.  Admittedly I don't read all the comments in a thread before I make a post. Great minds think alike!
×
×
  • Create New...