Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I haven't read that. I thought Baker and Darnold were evenly split.

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

If that means he understands the playbook better I get that. But from who can move the offense and will air it out it has to be Baker. Let's see how Darnold does when New England blitzes while playing tough man press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

So, to clarify, according to your sources, Darnold is leading the competition? And it's based on turnovers? I might be wrong, but Darnold has thrown more INTs in camp than Mayfield, last count at the end of TC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, CRA said:

Given the way Rhule looks at other spots like Baker\Sam, our C situation, Brady going from not having the tools to play LT to keeping our top 10 LT out of the spot to date….I’d say it is a tough sell.  

Think the most obvious take is Rhule has a pointless mess in front of Corral and Corral suffers from that.  You got dudes like 89 saying it’s clear watching that Corral is a stud that needs reps/time to develop. 

Rhule has fantasy competitions that aren’t real.   That’s the story.  Corral is part of trickle down effect.  There are others.   Like Baker and Bozeman not working together all off-season and figuring it out in season pointlessly, etc.  But we got college Rhule out there screwing around not able to figure out the clear cut best players. 

Well, I don't think that Rhule is making all of the decisions now, so we'll see what if anything has changed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 


Yep. It’s why this QB competition is still going on. Matt can’t decide on who to hitch his NFL career to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 

Fair point...

Throw in that all of his experience with  developing quarterbacks revolves around guys who will be starting in three years, two at the most. Corral might be called upon to start as early as next year (this year of injuries happen).

I seriously doubt he understands the NFL version of "the process".

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 

then if that is true (which I believe) it shows that fitt force fed Corral on rhule and thus explaining things

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2022 at 10:54 AM, Jackie Lee said:

 

If that's the case why exactly is he toying around with Elf and Jordan starting the game with Baker (almost getting him destroyed) before giving Sam Bozeman/BC/Ickey to play behind? He's got some serious mental issues to work through when it comes to pride and nepotism..

 

Eflein gonna Elflein!

If only we had gone out and picked up a really good Center during free agency. (sarcasm)

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

OMG! So that means they've figured out nothing.

Smh. They're measuring two midgets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...