Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I haven't read that. I thought Baker and Darnold were evenly split.

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

If that means he understands the playbook better I get that. But from who can move the offense and will air it out it has to be Baker. Let's see how Darnold does when New England blitzes while playing tough man press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

So, to clarify, according to your sources, Darnold is leading the competition? And it's based on turnovers? I might be wrong, but Darnold has thrown more INTs in camp than Mayfield, last count at the end of TC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, CRA said:

Given the way Rhule looks at other spots like Baker\Sam, our C situation, Brady going from not having the tools to play LT to keeping our top 10 LT out of the spot to date….I’d say it is a tough sell.  

Think the most obvious take is Rhule has a pointless mess in front of Corral and Corral suffers from that.  You got dudes like 89 saying it’s clear watching that Corral is a stud that needs reps/time to develop. 

Rhule has fantasy competitions that aren’t real.   That’s the story.  Corral is part of trickle down effect.  There are others.   Like Baker and Bozeman not working together all off-season and figuring it out in season pointlessly, etc.  But we got college Rhule out there screwing around not able to figure out the clear cut best players. 

Well, I don't think that Rhule is making all of the decisions now, so we'll see what if anything has changed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 


Yep. It’s why this QB competition is still going on. Matt can’t decide on who to hitch his NFL career to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 

Fair point...

Throw in that all of his experience with  developing quarterbacks revolves around guys who will be starting in three years, two at the most. Corral might be called upon to start as early as next year (this year of injuries happen).

I seriously doubt he understands the NFL version of "the process".

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, rayzor said:

why spend energy trying to develop anyone for the future when you can't see having a job beyond this year?

you need evidence he's on a hot seat and he knows it, it's this. 

then if that is true (which I believe) it shows that fitt force fed Corral on rhule and thus explaining things

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2022 at 10:54 AM, Jackie Lee said:

 

If that's the case why exactly is he toying around with Elf and Jordan starting the game with Baker (almost getting him destroyed) before giving Sam Bozeman/BC/Ickey to play behind? He's got some serious mental issues to work through when it comes to pride and nepotism..

 

Eflein gonna Elflein!

If only we had gone out and picked up a really good Center during free agency. (sarcasm)

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snake said:

If you add in TC reps he's had more time with the first string. I'm hearing from my sources within the organization. As of now according to him Darnold is ahead of Mayfield and he must prove he can limit turnovers. I completely disagree with this and for one hope he's wrong but he hasn't been in the past. 

OMG! So that means they've figured out nothing.

Smh. They're measuring two midgets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...