Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Early 2023 NFL Draft Projection


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Van Dyke is my guy. He has an "it" factor about him.

Levis is old and inaccurate, doesn’t have the liberty of a long mer development period like Allen. Richardson is unproven, this will be his first full year, McKee should be better and isn’t. Van Dyke is young, hitting the measurables, trending up. He’s the one to peg high. I’ll be interested to see him. The Jurcovek BC kid sucks IMO, he’s a paper champ.

Haener in-game is something to watch tho.  I’ll back that dude to the moon and back savage garden style.

Edited by saX man
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Funny thing about the QBS in next year draft.. None are putting numbers up like Baker did in College..

Have yau'll seen Baker College numbers??

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/baker-mayfield-1.html

Dam!! 

I was so busy being about Cam.. That I didn't notice how dominate he was in college..

inflated qb stats in college is in no way a direct correlation of success in the nfl

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am consistently amazed that college fans assume statistical success in college is a 1:1 with statistical success in the NFL.

I mean our head coach seems more interested in what players did in college, too (and particularly where they went to college 🙄)

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Funny thing about the QBS in next year draft.. None are putting numbers up like Baker did in College..

Have yau'll seen Baker College numbers??

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/baker-mayfield-1.html

Dam!! 

I was so busy being about Cam.. That I didn't notice how dominate he was in college..

I know, they surprised me too.  His college stats will probably be comparable to the next years draft class that we are all drooling over.  There will be no guarantee that Stroud and co will be any better, though they might be.  They're cap hit will be much cheaper than Baker in 2023, but their draft capital cost will be much higher.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Nah trade up from 32 for Noah Sewell 

i really like Sewell too.  My dream realistic dream scenario is pick at 16-18 then trade down a few picks to get a 2nd or 3rd rounder to recoup draft capital. Grab Sewell or our starting high level center of the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...