Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Early 2023 NFL Draft Projection


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Van Dyke is my guy. He has an "it" factor about him.

Levis is old and inaccurate, doesn’t have the liberty of a long mer development period like Allen. Richardson is unproven, this will be his first full year, McKee should be better and isn’t. Van Dyke is young, hitting the measurables, trending up. He’s the one to peg high. I’ll be interested to see him. The Jurcovek BC kid sucks IMO, he’s a paper champ.

Haener in-game is something to watch tho.  I’ll back that dude to the moon and back savage garden style.

Edited by saX man
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Funny thing about the QBS in next year draft.. None are putting numbers up like Baker did in College..

Have yau'll seen Baker College numbers??

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/baker-mayfield-1.html

Dam!! 

I was so busy being about Cam.. That I didn't notice how dominate he was in college..

inflated qb stats in college is in no way a direct correlation of success in the nfl

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am consistently amazed that college fans assume statistical success in college is a 1:1 with statistical success in the NFL.

I mean our head coach seems more interested in what players did in college, too (and particularly where they went to college 🙄)

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Funny thing about the QBS in next year draft.. None are putting numbers up like Baker did in College..

Have yau'll seen Baker College numbers??

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/baker-mayfield-1.html

Dam!! 

I was so busy being about Cam.. That I didn't notice how dominate he was in college..

I know, they surprised me too.  His college stats will probably be comparable to the next years draft class that we are all drooling over.  There will be no guarantee that Stroud and co will be any better, though they might be.  They're cap hit will be much cheaper than Baker in 2023, but their draft capital cost will be much higher.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Nah trade up from 32 for Noah Sewell 

i really like Sewell too.  My dream realistic dream scenario is pick at 16-18 then trade down a few picks to get a 2nd or 3rd rounder to recoup draft capital. Grab Sewell or our starting high level center of the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...