Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes it’s homerism but bet on the Panthers to win the division


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't know about that one chief.

But if our o-line can block and Baker is just competent, I see us making a wild card on the virtue of our defense being on the field a lot less and not the obscene amount of time they were on the field some games last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been saying that for months and after the bucs IOL got erased and Brady just up and left during TC........ looking better and better.

Wise bet. 

Not buying failcons PS "sucess", without many miracles they will blow hard.

Iants........no one talks about their underrated D. Lost great play caller, designer, and pill popper. WRs are having issues. Lost a great LT in FA.

 

It's a three team race, even with Rhule. Look around, the other HCs are nothing to brag about either....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s possible could be a tight race between US, Saints for 2nd.. still think the BUCs take the division just cuz of Brady.. The Saints have a tough defense still.. they’re question mark is tasty crab fingers, Winston.. if he’s on they will be tough as usual.. I need to see our run defense improve and an offense that can score TDs.. Panthers have the players just can the new coaches help Rhule from his boofonery!!?? Is it a word?? Dunno.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

Bucs O-line is a WRECK, tough to use all those fancy weapons if you have 2 seconds to throw

 

Saints are a new coach and semi-rebuild

 

Falcons are a TOTAL rebuild

 

If CMC is healthy and O-line is serviceable then these are VERY good odds

2506FBE8-FBB8-4AB6-B1CB-144E31A415F0.jpeg

You are right.

It is homerism.

Have you somehow managed to miss Tom Brady's entire career at New England?

The Bucs do not need a credible Oline. The refs will keep opposing defenses off him regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...