Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: best & worst vs Bills


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burris, Deonte Brown might struggle to get a spot.  I was a bit disappointed by Cade Mays, but--very much like BC--they are playing him at one position one week, another the following week.  That has to be confusing. I am of the mindset that you develop a player at one position and then you expose him to another.  But I am no Matt Rhule.

It does seem as though the OL depth is becoming clear---Mays, Jordan, Elf (he is not starting over Bozeman) and maybe Erving---but I am not sure I would keep Erving.   He reminds me of the Marty Hurney method of self promotion---overpay an average player in hopes that plays up to the contract.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Burris, Deonte Brown might struggle to get a spot.  I was a bit disappointed by Cade Mays, but--very much like BC--they are playing him at one position one week, another the following week.  That has to be confusing. I am of the mindset that you develop a player at one position and then you expose him to another.  But I am no Matt Rhule.

It does seem as though the OL depth is becoming clear---Mays, Jordan, Elf (he is not starting over Bozeman) and maybe Erving---but I am not sure I would keep Erving.   He reminds me of the Marty Hurney method of self promotion---overpay an average player in hopes that plays up to the contract.

 

The only thing that's going to get rid of Erving is the Rhule Curse [Does anyone need explanation?], but Irving seems like he's immune to it. Rhule genuinely seems to value Erving as a lineman. "He's so athletic! He can play any position..."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

The only thing that's going to get rid of Erving is the Rhule Curse [Does anyone need explanation?], but Irving seems like he's immune to it. Rhule genuinely seems to value Erving as a lineman. "He's so athletic! He can play any position..."

I will never understand the infatuation Rhule had or has with him. It defies all logic and reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChuckWag78 said:

"-Poor Sam"

This was my thought exactly when I saw the scores. 

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a QB drafted that high try hard but still suck. Unlike most high drafted busts it’s not laziness or injury that killed his career, he just doesn’t have the intangibles you want in a QB much less as a team leader. He’s basically the living form of “Bad Luck Brian”.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Riverboat Ron said:

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a QB drafted that high try hard but still suck. Unlike most high drafted busts it’s not laziness or injury that killed his career, he just doesn’t have the intangibles you want in a QB much less as a team leader. He’s basically the living form of “Bad Luck Brian”.

He is so ill-suited to being an NFL QB that you wonder how anyone scouted him and didn't pick up on it?

It's wild.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...