Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayfield comment on the Browns game


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't wanna know what you googled to find that 😳

I went to Gif---typed in "boner".  I had a very wide selection of options, but this one made me gasp.  I thought, "You know, I am going to act 12 since I am protected by anonymity." 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bruceleeroy said:

It's already clear some of you are not going to be able to handle Baker.  This is nothing compared to what he will bring in the season.  Buckle up.

We've sucked ass for almost 4 years, can't believe some people want more patience no cursing on the sidelines

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

And those words will not help him f**k Cleveland up. Talk is cheap. Running ones mouth does not make them Steve Smith. 

I disagree. He's firing up his team, which can definitely have an effect on how they come together on gameday. Same reason he's drummed up a rivalry with Shaq and why Boseman calls him the type of guy you want to play for.

We've been through this already with Cam. While folks complained everytime he showed emotion on the field his teammates rallied around him because he was all in. Other players wanted to play with Cam because of it.

At the end of the day it's a game, and all things equal I'd bet most of them would prefer a leader who's emotionally engaged over the stoic robots that boomers want them to be.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

He should have known better to say anything like that around a reporter.  Now he better back it up or he's going to look mighty foolish. All bark and no bite.

I get that, but at the same time... I am so happy to have a QB with some attitude and personality other than "corporate talk". We've only had a few here since the teams inception. Smitty, Norman, Cam, prob a few I'm forgetting. 

About time we had someone that actually wanted to fug other teams up

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

I disagree. He's firing up his team, which can definitely have an effect on how they come together on gameday. Same reason he's drummed up a rivalry with Shaq and why Boseman calls him the type of guy you want to play for.

We've been through this already with Cam. While folks complained everytime he showed emotion on the field his teammates rallied around him because he was all in. Other players wanted to play with Cam because of it.

At the end of the day it's a game, and all things equal I'd bet most of them would prefer a leader who's emotionally engaged over the stoic robots that boomers want them to be.

Like is said, if he doesn't back it up the locker room will not buy into his bravado because it is all bark and no bite. Talking sh!t loses its meaning if it is not backed up by action.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I love this draft because they picked the right OL.  It is possible that we have 2 rookies starting on the OL.  I would take Utah's Lomu as well, but for those who think you find the OL in free agency and not the draft, here is all I have to say:  We cannot give $110m to the 5 starting OL.  We need an infusion of youth on the OL as well.  If Ickey returns and can play, I imagine that he takes over for Hunt at RG--in 2027 or so.  Currently, our 2 guards and right tackle make up over 20% of the total cap.  We have to add 2 starters, but if Cade Mays was too pricey at around (anticipated) $8m, then we plan to draft a C, it seems. I think we draft an OT and C now because we will need a G or 2 and a RT soon.  While they were good in 2026, they were not elite.  For that kind of $$, we need elite.  Is starting a rookie LT and C ideal?  Nope.  But if we can get better than Nijman and Mays, we should be OK. I think we will pick up an ILB in free agency and add an ILB.  Who we draft (Mike or Will) will depend on who we sign.  Rodriguez is a favorite of mine, but if Golday is there, Morgan is going to take him.  Morgan will love him. I do not think we need to overpopulate the edge position right now because we have 1 edge returning from injury (Jones II), one rookie from last year ready to step up and could be really good (Scourton), and another who could be ready to step into the situational pass rusher role (Princely).  2 hold the edge very well and if we had a situational pass rusher to join Princely, we could be much better. I think rookies at Edge tend to jump considerably from their rookie seasons to years 2 and 3.  (Charles Johnson, Mike Rucker, and Greg Hardy were that way-and all became very good in time. Safety seems omitted, but we shall see.  That could be another free agent acquisition.
    • Id like Evans from Duke in the draft as a shooter for the second unit. And probably a more athletic big to replace all, he's good but doesn't really fit the style. White, Evans, green, Williams and center tbd is a pretty good second unit 
×
×
  • Create New...