Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official cut list (updated @ 4pm)


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TANTRIC-NINJA said:

Tae seemed pretty sharp and polished in pre season. Hope we see him back on the roster when things get settled  

He'll end up on the PS if he's eligible. I think he has a high ceiling...just not quite as high as Stanley Thomas Oliver's according to our coaching staff. STO is also pretty good at ST. 

Speaking of which, I think that's the only justifiable reason Chandler and Franklin are still here imo. These two and Rhule are so attached I get'em mixed up. 

Side notes: 

Shi Smith should have made Robert's expendable. 

Lavishka definitely upgrades the WR depth.  

Our DE depth on one side, weight wise, is paper thin lol. We have four DE's as of right now. Three on the right with Burns being the heaviest of the three...yeah that might be a problem down the road. 

Not alot of power but at least we'll be fast...smh

P.S. Zlystra, Barnes, Lovett, Kirkwood, or Wright will end up a Patriot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Didn't he have the lowest rated single game grade out of all olinemen last season by PFF? Shouldn't be that tough to replace. Maybe even a tackling dummy would suffice.

Jordan would have been cut if we hadn't been able to deal Daley. We didn't want to keep just 8 OL, so he stuck.  Dude is hanging on by a thread and can easily be replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Jermaine Carter just got his ass cut by the Chiefs 

I think people were a little traumatized by back to back years of Whitehead then Carter. Shaq/Luvu/Littleton/Smith/Wilson with Chinn up in the box more since Xavier can cover should be solid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...