Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 2023 QB Watch


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, saX man said:

Brugler released his mock on a new Athletic FS pod this week so his is new and off his latest intel. Some really good insight on it. Unsure if Richardson is as high as some are projecting.  Can’t dispute the upside but the hype may not be there for decision makers yet.

Yeah if Stroud falls to us around there It would be hard for the staff to pass up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2022 at 10:34 AM, 45catfan said:

At lot of you guys are high on these super-thin resume`, extremely young (raw), one-year wonders.  If we don't get Stroud/Young, I am more than content to trade back and go after some of these other QBs who have better resume`s. 

This is always an interesting one. The thin resume guys haven’t had as much of a chance to show what they can’t do, so it is close to 100% upside. The more experienced guys have showed more of their limitations. So the limited ones have more of a “what if?”. But it is such a guess work on how any of them will truly develop.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jaxel said:

I wouldn't be mad with Max Duggan in the second.

I wouldn't bank on him being more than a 4th-ish rounder at best.  He's also had Quinten Johnson all season to chuck it to.  He can take a lick, so there's that, but NFL level passer? I'm unsure.  Per the Athletic:

Quote

As a prospect, Duggan is interesting. He has enough power to fire the ball to all three levels of the field, and his play strength as a ball carrier is impressive. But he’ll miss too many layups and isn’t a refined passer. He doesn’t properly use his eyes to hold defenders, and he tends to throw to areas, not spots, meaning too many throws are behind his target or on the wrong shoulder. However, Duggan’s size and toughness could get him drafted. He takes a beating and gets back up every time. I wouldn’t be surprised if a team views him as a Taysom Hill type of weapon, just not quite at the same level.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the bigs, it's really Penix and Ward that interest me the most, but I just don't know what's realistic draft wise for them.  And I have a suspicion Ward stays in school.

Overall, not a proponent of trying to find a "sleeper" in the mid-rounds and claim they're somehow franchise changers, but there's some guys that can run NFL offenses in this draft.  This may be one of the deeper QB drafts in quite some time, with many drafted, but it's simply not top heavy or have any modern star prototypes. 

So may not be generating excitement, but there's going to be guys teams could target Day 2 that go higher than expected.  It also makes me feel like there's going to be someone who works out in the long run we don't see coming.  

So who are the ones that may not get projected high but teams take them higher than expected? With the year wound down, notables that have finished the year strong from a QB standpoint/making NFL-level throws & decisions:

Aidan O'Connell QB Purdue 6'3 210 

Jake Haener QB Fresno State 6'1 201

Michael Pratt QB Tulane 6'3 210

Clayton Tune QB Houston 6'3 220

I'd watch out for these ones ^^^^

Panthers wise, any would be good in a double dip scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

 

There went my 3rd round pick if we didn't take a QB in the first round.  If these underclassmen nearly all opt to stay in school, then this QB draft is going to dry up quickly.  Depth was going to be the hallmark of this QB draft as it was limited at the top.  It was and is the Stroud/Young show at the top, nothing about that is changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's assume all underclassmen QBs that's not named Stroud or Young return to school, this is the list we would be looking at:

RSR- Levis-Kentucky

RSR-Hooker-Tennessee

RSR-Leary-NCSU

RSR-Haener-Fresno St.

RSR-O'Connell-Purdue

RSR-Morgan-Minnestoa

SR-Duggan-TCU

SR-Nix Oregon

SR-Tune-Houston

SR-Mordecai-SMU

-There's a few others, I only listed 10,  but are so far down the list they will be UFAs.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Let's assume all underclassmen QBs that's not named Stroud or Young return to school, this is the list we would be looking at:

RSR- Levis-Kentucky

RSR-Hooker-Tennessee

RSR-Leary-NCSU

RSR-Haener-Fresno St.

RSR-O'Connell-Purdue

RSR-Morgan-Minnestoa

SR-Duggan-TCU

SR-Nix Oregon

SR-Tune-Houston

SR-Mordecai-SMU

-There's a few others, I only listed 10,  but are so far down the list they will be UFAs.

 

 

 

Bolded who I think is draftable.  I do think this Michael Pratt is an interesting guy as well to throw into the mix.  Tulane rocked house this year and he looked very good doing it.

60% + completion, 8.6 per, 33 TDs (25 pass), 5 INTs, closed out the year beating 2 ranked teams in a row.    

Quote

Pratt (6'2/205) isn't getting much buzz ahead of the 2022 season after he suffered behind a subpar offensive line with an incredibly thin supporting cast last season, but the individual talent in his game is apparent to those who get into the film and go beyond the stat line while considering the circumstances. It's because of that Pratt was recently named to the Maxwell Award preseason watch list. The honor is presented annually to the best player in college football.

 

Tulane sophomore QB Michael Pratt is among the most underrated in college football according to one analyst.

Pratt (6'2/205) hasn't received a lot of national attention ahead of the 2022 season, but is a dark horse candidate to be one of the best in the nation this year. Crissy Froyd of Sports Illustrated and NBC Sports EDGE recently pinned Pratt as a player to watch: "Looking at the film, he's got a bit of Tyler Van Dyke to his game -- a comparison that's certainly a positive one considering the Miami quarterback is largely projected to be a first-rounder in April. Pratt seems to be mentally further along than a lot of other quarterbacks with his same experience level in taking what the defense gives him and delivering an accurate ball at all levels of the field even in the face of pressure (which he was frequently subjected to) and has a good foundation to develop off of as potentially one of the most underrated quarterbacks in college football."

That was before Van Dykes blunder of a 2022 season, but if that was the word and he turned around the year he did, you HAVE to think he's on radars.  Very interesting prospect in my view.  

Tulane finished #16 in the country.  The Cotton Bowl is one of the games to watch against USC.  VERY interested to see how they stack up.

Caleb & Addison vs. Pratt & Spears

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • you seen our Dline, they wont have time to throw, who needs a CB.     Just Kidding
    • Our Panthers reporter, Anthony Rizutti of Panthers Wire provides us with a few grades. I've added a couple of more snippets of analyses from some NC guys, including our friend Scott Fowler in Charlotte and a vid from Panthers Playbook's Dennis Cox and Chris Lea in Raleigh. It is food for thought. Of course we all have our opinions, but, me personally, I tend to giive the opinion of hardcore fans and people that actually follow the team a little more weight.  Touchdown Wire:     B Draft Wire:                B+ USA Today:               C NFL.com:                  B ESPN:                        B- PFF:                          C Yahoo Sports:          C CBS Sports:             C+ If you want to read their little summaries, hit the link. But as you can see, the national types have largely graded the draft average. There seems to be an acknowledgement of the fact that Morgan and company were in a hard place due to the malfeasance of the previous administrations, but that our FO did the best it could. One of the "experts" mentioned the "boom-or-bust" nature of our draft, which is an interesting way to characterize it, but I'm good with that. And Charles McDonald may have put it best which basically alluded to the fact that so much of the grade is simply based upon the unknown: "Even though they’re getting a C, it’s hard not to be caught by the allure of the unknown here. It’s a really interesting class." https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/lists/panthers-nfl-draft-grades-experts-2024/   Tony Pauline, another national talking head, took his page straight out Debbie Downer's playbook, but it's all about perspective, right? Here's a bone for those that are decidedly negative about the outcome: "You could brand the Panthers as this year’s losers before the event began, considering they frittered away the first pick of the draft last year to select Bryce Young. Trading up one spot for the final selection of Round 1 to select Xavier Legette, a Day 2 receiver prospect, kept things going in the wrong direction for Carolina."   One person who has been---perhaps what has been perceived as negative about the direction of the franchise---decidedly sober-minded and what I consider fair about the way things have been going under the Tepper era has been Scott Fowler. By now, everyone should have heard of the contentious relationship that he and David Tepper have. Fowler has called Tepper out on his decided malfeasance (labelling it inTeptitude as I recall), and Tepper, the owner that is a somewhat contentious all own his own by the simplest of "slights," has outwardly acted inappropriate (in my opinion, toward Fowler. But Fowler was decidedly positive about this year's draft. "While nationally the Panthers didn’t get nearly the same amount of attention in this draft as they did in 2023, owing to the controversial big-splash trade and the ensuing selection of Young a year ago, this group may be more significant as a whole." Fowler gave the draft a B+ "This team is going to be more exciting. In particular, I have high hopes for Legette and Sanders. Carolina didn’t get everything it wanted — an edge rusher in the first two days of the draft would have been nice, for instance. But overall, I’m giving the Panthers a grade of B+ for the 2024 NFL Draft. Which, given the team as a whole got an F last year, is quite an upgrade." You may hit a paywall:https://www.heraldonline.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article287830040.html#storylink=cpy   And finally, here is Dennis Cox And Chris Lea. I thought they were fair and thoughtful in their assessment. They call Dan and Dave (and company) "The Alignment," because of being on the same page.  For me, that alone, is worth the listen.  
    • I honestly don't really care. This year is all about figuring out if Bryce is it. Period. Because if we have another high pick next year (pretty likely if we're being honest) we need to know if we need a QB.
×
×
  • Create New...