Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Matt Rhule has been fired watch...


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

Fire Rhule and beg Like to come fill in as coach rest of the season. Hopefully he gets the coaching bug and likes it. If he likes it offer him a contract and build a staff for him.

Supposed to say "Luke". I wasn't joking by the way. This guy may be a damn football genius God. What better way to find out than to get him as interim coach and see how the players take to him while seeing if effort goes up and just general in game coaching decisions get smarter. If he would decide to be a coach (I don't think he is interested unfortunately though) it could be a perfect storm and there is NO WAY IN HELL he is worse than Rhule. My money is on he is significantly better and also coaches with a fire Rhule couldn't have while also having major respect of th players due to him being there just recently and him knowing what they all go through while also doing it at a very high level when he did do it.

Luke Kuechly Football GIF by Carolina Panthers

Edited by YourLastThought
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I'm thinking Meyer might have set the mark last year.

We have the Giants on the road and then Saints at home next two up.  If we are 0-3 at that point with the schedule only getting harder, Tepper should pull the trigger.  Will he?  Probably not.  Tepper will run this organization further into the ground trying to prove that Rhule was not a bad hire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We have the Giants on the road and then Saints at home next two up.  If we are 0-3 at that point with the schedule only getting harder, Tepper should pull the trigger.  Will he?  Probably not.  Tepper will run this organization further into the ground trying to prove that Rhule was not a bad hire.

George Allen was fired after 2 preseason games in 1978

Jack Patera was only two games into his seventh year with the Seahawks in 1982 

Joe Collier only made it two games into the 1968 (AFL) season before the Bills fired him.

Hugo Bezdek was fired by the Rams after just three games into the 1938 season

I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility that losing to the Giants will be the last of Matt Rhule in Carolina

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cavscout said:

George Allen was fired after 2 preseason games in 1978

Jack Patera was only two games into his seventh year with the Seahawks in 1982 

Joe Collier only made it two games into the 1968 (AFL) season before the Bills fired him.

Hugo Bezdek was fired by the Rams after just three games into the 1938 season

I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility that losing to the Giants will be the last of Matt Rhule in Carolina

Only problem being Tepper--"brass balls Tepper"-- is a little attached to his boy Rhule.  You would think a hedge fund guy would be somewhat ruthless, personal feelings aside.  After all, business is business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys do realize Rhule is NOT getting fired any time soon right? As much as I wish that were not the case this guy may be here the WHOLE DAMN SEASON but I am willing to bet he wouldn't be fired until at least about 12 or 13 games into the season and that is a HUGE MAYBE. I'm guessing his goofy ass lasts the whole year unfortunately!

GIF by ABC Network

Edited by YourLastThought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The boo birds were out in force you could clearly hear that yesterday.

Community support for Rhule is almost zero.

Tepper would be well respected by everyone including Rhule who would go away skipping happily away with a fortune.

He's probably been expecting the ax. Where are the brass balls NOW? Oh, prosthetic brass balls on a desk aren't as tough as real balls huh?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really tried to give Matt Rhule a chance but I keep seeing the same mistakes ever since he was hired in 2020. Run defense is still terrible, penalties, clock management, and the team looked unprepared. I think this team has talent we just need the right coach. I also believe that if Rhule is fired this year we are 100% drafting a QB in 2023 even if we have to move multiple draft picks to move up and get one.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...