Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is anyone here not waving the white flag?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, davos said:

A close loss is a loss.  We’ll see how Rhule looks against a rookie coach and roster pending demolition next week.  A loss to the Giants is the death nail.

And then the schedule actually gets tough lol

yeah I am somewhat happy without the team bounced back today, we had a new offense vs one of the best D's in the NFL. Next week is everything though, loose to the giants and ill be distraught. Its a week 1 L to an AFC team, means nothing in terms of tiebreakers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally appreciate the fact that this team played a competitive game against a quality team. Normally this is the type of team that curb stomps the Panthers, particularly in the second half. Instead of looking for something else to do with my day by the third quarter, I got to watch a really good football game. Adjustments were made. Team fell short, but there's definitely hope.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good game by the Panthers.  Ekwonu has to pay his dues, good to get the worst he'll see out of the way in week 1.  The Browns running game is the best the Panthers will see this year, but they couldn't run out the 4th quarter on the Panthers Defense.  The offense showed fortitude, shaking off early challenges and getting things moving, taking the lead with a minute and change left in the game.  McCaffrey looked good and heads into week 2 healthy.  In the end a blown call and a 58 yd fg lost this game, it happens in the NFL unfortunately.  There's a lot of positives to take away. The real test is how the Panthers play next week vs the Giants.  You can't let 1 tough loss turn into 2.  Hopefully the Panthers offense gets things going earlier.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the season? Of course not the book is unwritten on Baker as of yet. But if anyone is still fully buying what Rhule is selling after seeing how poor the offense has been under his watch via multiple different quarterbacks and coordinators they are either mentally ill or must be related to the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...