Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday Pressers


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Maybe we would have had more attempts at the plate had the ball be put in CMC's hands more often in the first half.  But let's say that first half struggles is why he didn't get the touches.  FML

I counted 3 plays that were for CMC but we botched the snap in the first half alone. That to me is a big game changer for us. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

It's the job of coaching to 1) make sure your players do everything right and 2) make players correct what they don't do right.

If you didn't know this before, you know it now . 

I imagine tackling is something that's pretty difficult to evaluate in training camp when players aren't going all out, even during full contact.  And to your #2 - Snow mentioned that they're working on fixing up the tackling in preparation for the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

...or just run over 😕

I noticed a lot of the time when he had a tackle on him and got a chip from the te then he would totally give up on even trying to rush the passer and would stop and stand there.  I think that's part of why he brought it up and said hes going to have to work through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, stbugs said:

C’mon, we had three different starting Cs in 2016 due to all the injuries. Did we ever have that many bobbled snaps that year? New Cs and QBs come in games in college and NFL all the time and occasionally there can be a bad snap and they’ll say it’s a new pairing. Baker had more than enough reps in all of the preseason with Elflein that we should never have had that many bad snaps. I think PFF or somebody else said 4 of the 5 were on Baker. Baker is enough of a vet now that he should be able to lineup behind any starting NFL C and not have 5 bad snaps. After the first one, make sure you stay in there and secure the ball.

we had a NFL staff then.   I'm sure they would have addressed the known QB/C exchange issue before it spilled over into week 1.  And then Rhule bullshitted that hadn't been a problem.  That wasn't true per reporting. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least Phil feels better about the way we are losing. They are showing the kind of chill that makes me think Tepper has really told this staff they have the whole 7 years of the contract come hell or high water! There is no urgency and a care less attitude. They look like they couldn't be bothered. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

Well at least Phil feels better about the way we are losing. They are showing the kind of chill that makes me think Tepper has really told this staff they have the whole 7 years of the contract come hell or high water! There is no urgency and a care less attitude. They look like they couldn't be bothered. 

they're just collecting checks at this point. snow going to retire in a few years and rhule will either get fired after this season or tepper actually lets him stay for 7 years. either way, they're going to get their checks win or lose

Edited by Dave Gettleman's Shorts
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we see the same qb-c exchange issue early on Sunday i could see Bozeman getting a shot. If the defense is porous and gives up big plays to Saquon then I believe Matt Rhule will be pressured to move Snow to a position coach. I would be ecstatic to see Steve Wilks get the reigns again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...