Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants: The Previous Game is Under Review

TheCasillas

By TheCasillas,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

You mean that same Danny Dimes who was catching Passes against us last year 

we got the piss beat out of us last year by Joe Judge. Daboll is a better coach. 34-7 NYG

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
3838 Mentor

3838

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Careful now, you'll upset the Huddle negativity.

Edited by 3838
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted

I skimmed the game and it's still strange to see the Giants running a lot of 3-4, but it looks different with Wink running it. The interior rush looks solid so I think Elf and guards will have a tougher game than last week, but Ikem and Moton should be able to hold up a lot better on the edges. Wink's scheme also relies on man coverage and the Giants CB's room isn't really built for that. So yes I agree with OP, attack the CB's, get CMC outside, Baker scrambling right like he likes to do might actually work a little bit better against this D than CLE. Very different D than last week outside of both of them having not great CB's

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Until this Sunday's game is played recent results still have relevancy and he played well against us and he's off to a nice start this season. Let's shut him down then trash talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Thabkd @TheCasillasfantastic write up!

My only hope is that Rhule & co saw what you saw and will exploit the weaknesses you saw. Lol. 

I hope Rhule and the rest of the coaching staff are at least as capable of watching and breaking down film as our man TheCasillas here.  If not, we're in serious trouble. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Monday practice tweets

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...