Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does 0-2 put Rhule’s seat red hot?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, CRA said:

it's really hard to look worse than we did in 2021.  I mean, that season gets essentially every coach without a history of success fired in the NFL. 

Urban was taking up too much oxygen and attention.  That was a once in a decade type clusterfug that gave Rhule some cover. 

It's what I mean when I say I'm not sure what it will take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Can’t really tell with Tepper. He seems to enjoy doing the exact opposite of what fans actually want. I can see us winning five games again and Rhule getting a fourth year.

Anything less than playoffs and I think he’s gone next year. Bad record mid-season and I think he’s gone this year, I think that was part of the OC choice. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's the magic number.... and given we have we still have so many wine and cheesers... 

 

5 hours ago, CRA said:

keeping Rhule after a 3rd straight 5 win season is easy.

Keeping the BOA seats from being empty and still being able to sell tickets for the price you want going forward? Not as easy. 

Tepper does give a fug about money/financial success.  He also cares about his image.  And Matt Rhule simply can't continue to be what he is....and it not eventually become a really bad business deal for Tepper.  And I am not talking the actual Rhule contract here. And there is nothing saying he won't act to that IMO

I should have just pointed out that ticket sales are only about 1% of revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

 

I should have just pointed out that ticket sales are only about 1% of revenue.

I'm largely talking PSL.  And they held off on increasing them last year because we sucked so bad.  But that's what they want to do.  The PSL franchises keep raising and raising them because it's not 1% of revenue. 

PSLs, butts in the seats, and local dollars matter to a greedy billionaire who got into this to increase his wealth. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Tepper has learned his lesson and the next coach doesn’t get a 7 year deal. 
IMO, all new head coaches should get only 3 years.

Year 1 is a rebuild.

Year 2 is where you solidify your team and possible make a playoff push.

Year 3 is where your team should be winning and making noise during the season and then eventually the playoffs. 
 

If you team is playoff read by year 3 and you once again miss the playoffs. Then your butt needs to hit the pavement. 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant watch games like last night and think you are going to compete with Matt Rhule and Baker Mayfield. I mean what makes our owner and managers believe those are good moves. Clearly the goal is to be average at best like I have been saying. Theres a low level ceiling with both Rhule and Baker. Beating someone like this Giants team w Daniel Jones and half their players being out is not impressive to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Hopefully Tepper has learned his lesson and the next coach doesn’t get a 7 year deal. 
IMO, all new head coaches should get only 3 years.

Year 1 is a rebuild.

Year 2 is where you solidify your team and possible make a playoff push.

Year 3 is where your team should be winning and making noise during the season and then eventually the playoffs. 
 

If you team is playoff read by year 3 and you once again miss the playoffs. Then your butt needs to hit the pavement. 

This 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st red flag - Hired a college coach to an insane contract when He didn’t win anything at the college level to warrant such a kings ransom

2nd red flag - Gave total control and unchecked power over personnel to the newly hired head college coach

3rd red flag - We all knew we were in big trouble when Rhule built his pro staff with all of his college coaches and buddies 

4th red flag - his press conferences were/are so god damn cringe to listen too + whenever he would talk up a player in the media, they were cut sooner after 

All this and more before his first game vs Oakland 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be, but nothing will happen. Rhule is still owed like $43 million. I doubt David Tepper would piss 43 million away for sake of potentially winning some football games. I am afraid we're stuck with him so we might as well grit our teeth, support the team, and weather the storm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...